IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/infome/v19y2025i2s1751157725000318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring knowledge complexity in the biomedical domain based on a question-method knowledge representation model

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Ming
  • Mao, Jin
  • Liang, Zhentao
  • Zheng, Zhejun
  • Li, Gang

Abstract

In nowadays knowledge-driven economy, knowledge complexity plays a crucial role in gaining a competitive advantage. In the biomedical field, this complexity spurs innovation and enables resource monopolization. Previous studies on knowledge complexity have primarily examined the interactions between knowledge units and nonknowledge systems from a macro perspective. These analyses often overlook how the micro-level components of knowledge influence its overall complexity. This study marks a departure from such approaches by conceptualizing biomedical knowledge in terms of questions and methods, as well as proposing a novel method to measure knowledge complexity. This approach emphasizes the exploration of connections between knowledge units by constructing a question-method bipartite network. The validity of our methodology was rigorously tested through controlled experiments involving random networks and a comprehensive review of the relevant literature. Furthermore, this study reveals the relationship between knowledge complexity and dissemination, suggesting that the more complex knowledge is, the more likely it will be cited frequently. Internal knowledge flows within the same research question exhibit greater sensitivity to knowledge complexity than external flows. This study can help demystify the sophisticated scientific knowledge system and provides detailed insights into the complexity of scientific knowledge and dissemination mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Ming & Mao, Jin & Liang, Zhentao & Zheng, Zhejun & Li, Gang, 2025. "Measuring knowledge complexity in the biomedical domain based on a question-method knowledge representation model," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:19:y:2025:i:2:s1751157725000318
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2025.101667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157725000318
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joi.2025.101667?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:19:y:2025:i:2:s1751157725000318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.