IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/infome/v19y2025i2s1751157725000288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding knowledge growth in scientific collaboration process: Evidence from NSFC projects

Author

Listed:
  • Yao, Zhizhen
  • Huang, Xiaoming
  • Song, Haochen
  • Rong, Guoyang
  • Ma, Feicheng

Abstract

Scientific collaboration has become increasingly popular due to the growing complexity of scientific tasks, especially for scientific projects supported by large funding agencies such as The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC). This study focuses on modeling the network incremental elements within the scientific collaboration process of NSFC project teams to understand the intricate knowledge growth mechanisms. Four elements representing incremental knowledge were defined: Isolation, Mixed Addition, Inclusion, and Internal Correlation. Additionally, four knowledge incremental patterns and different collaboration processes were identified. The study discovered the following key findings: (1) NSFC project teams prioritize knowledge absorption and integration during collaboration, predominantly advancing knowledge through Mixed Addition approaches. (2) Teams in Management Science and Engineering (MSE) discipline tend to expand through Mixed Addition approaches, while Economic Science (ES) teams prefer Inclusion and Internal Correlation approaches for team development compared to MSE teams. (3) The knowledge pioneering pattern negatively impacts productivity, while the emergence of knowledge expansion and enhancement patterns can lead to significant improvements. Overall, this study explores the team collaboration process from the knowledge growth perspective, which provides valuable insights for optimizing team management and improving collaboration efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao, Zhizhen & Huang, Xiaoming & Song, Haochen & Rong, Guoyang & Ma, Feicheng, 2025. "Understanding knowledge growth in scientific collaboration process: Evidence from NSFC projects," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:19:y:2025:i:2:s1751157725000288
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2025.101664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157725000288
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joi.2025.101664?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:19:y:2025:i:2:s1751157725000288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.