IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iburev/v35y2026i2s0969593126000077.html

A multilevel framework for analysing organisational misconduct in emerging economies

Author

Listed:
  • Anand, Amitabh
  • Rottig, Daniel
  • Stocker, Miklós
  • Bodolica, Virginia

Abstract

Organisational misconduct in emerging economies (EEs) undermines trust in local markets, distorts competition, and creates considerable economic and societal costs, with implications that increasingly extend beyond national borders. International business scholarship on the topic has grown substantially and generated valuable insights, yet it remains fragmented and conceptually limited in important ways. Cumulative understanding of organisational misconduct in EEs is constrained by two critical issues. First, the literature is characterised by a persistent developed-country bias that relies on oversimplified dichotomisations between developed and emerging economies, obscuring institutional complexity and limiting theoretical insight. Second, existing studies predominantly adopt single-level analyses that fail to capture how organisational misconduct emerges from dynamic interactions across economy, organisation, and individual levels. To address these limitations, we advance a multilevel analytical framework that integrates economy-level institutional conditions, organisational processes, and individual behaviour, while drawing attention to the frequent misalignment between formal rules (de jure) and their enactment in practice (de facto). We conclude by outlining a research agenda for advancing understanding of organisational misconduct in EEs and by offering actionable guidance for managers and policymakers navigating the institutional complexities of emerging economies and interconnected environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Anand, Amitabh & Rottig, Daniel & Stocker, Miklós & Bodolica, Virginia, 2026. "A multilevel framework for analysing organisational misconduct in emerging economies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:35:y:2026:i:2:s0969593126000077
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2026.102563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593126000077
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2026.102563?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:35:y:2026:i:2:s0969593126000077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/133/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.