IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iburev/v34y2025i6s0969593125000757.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional quality and investment disputes in emerging and frontier economies

Author

Listed:
  • Buitrago R., Ricardo E.

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between institutional quality and investor-state disputes in emerging and frontier economies. Analyzing data from 40 countries for 2008–2020 using a fixed-effects negative binomial regression model, I investigate how different dimensions of institutional quality affect the occurrence of investment disputes. The results reveal a complex pattern: Stronger regulatory quality, rule of law, legal efficiency, and expropriation risk protection are associated with fewer disputes, whereas stronger property rights protection and more international investment agreements are associated with increased dispute frequency. Robustness checks suggest a more complex relationship with property rights than was initially found. These findings collectively indicate that institutional development transforms rather than simply reducing investment risk, as stronger institutions simultaneously attract investment while providing clearer grounds for legal action and raising investor expectations. These findings contribute to institutional theory and have implications for policymakers seeking to balance institutional development with dispute risk management in emerging and frontier economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Buitrago R., Ricardo E., 2025. "Institutional quality and investment disputes in emerging and frontier economies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(6).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:34:y:2025:i:6:s0969593125000757
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593125000757
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102462?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:34:y:2025:i:6:s0969593125000757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/133/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.