IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iburev/v34y2025i5s096959312500099x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural dimensions and corporate controversies: The moderating role of corporate governance

Author

Listed:
  • DasGupta, Ranjan
  • Deb, Soumya Guha

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between national culture, defined by Hofstede's cultural dimensions, and corporate controversies across countries, while assessing the influence of firm-level corporate governance on moderating this connection. It finds more likelihood of controversies in cultures characterized by individualism, femininity, high power distance, low uncertainty avoidance, short-term orientation, and indulgence. Notably, certain CG mechanisms—especially board independence and a higher presence of female directors—can help reduce firms’ involvement in controversies, though their moderating effects vary across different cultural contexts. Furthermore, enhancing our baseline analysis, we categorize corporate controversies, analyse the influence of cultural traits on each category, and highlight specific cultural combinations associated with a decreased risk of controversies. Our findings underscore the complex interplay of cultural influences and governance structures in the ethical operations of cross-country firms.

Suggested Citation

  • DasGupta, Ranjan & Deb, Soumya Guha, 2025. "Cultural dimensions and corporate controversies: The moderating role of corporate governance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(5).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:34:y:2025:i:5:s096959312500099x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096959312500099X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102486?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:34:y:2025:i:5:s096959312500099x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/133/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.