IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v99y2026ics1544612326004721.html

Can the SME promotion law curb trade credit exploitation by listed companies? — Evidence from a supply chain perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Wanxin
  • Wang, Haoyu

Abstract

From a supply chain perspective, this paper examines whether the implementation of the SME Promotion Law in 2018 affected the payment behavior of listed companies toward their SME suppliers. Empirical results show that listed companies with SME suppliers significantly reduced their accounts payable and payment periods after the policy was enacted, consistent with a decline in opportunistic trade credit appropriation in asymmetric buyer–supplier relationships. Mechanism analyses indicate that this effect is mainly associated with heightened litigation risk and increased social attention induced by the law. The policy effect is more pronounced among firms with weaker repayment capacity or lower voluntary repayment motivation, in regions with weaker legal enforcement, and in industries with higher inventory turnover. Further analysis shows that firms with greater policy-induced improvement in payment behavior received more government subsidies and exhibited higher firm value. Overall, the findings highlight the role of legal intervention in shaping supply chain payment governance in an emerging market setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Wanxin & Wang, Haoyu, 2026. "Can the SME promotion law curb trade credit exploitation by listed companies? — Evidence from a supply chain perspective," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:99:y:2026:i:c:s1544612326004721
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2026.109943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612326004721
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2026.109943?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:99:y:2026:i:c:s1544612326004721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.