IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v95y2026ics1544612326002564.html

Green credit as ex ante climate-risk mitigation: Financing constraints, fintech amplification, and textual evidence from Chinese banks

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Zhanyang
  • Zhao, Jiaojiao

Abstract

Corporate climate-risk disclosure is crucial for financial stability; however, micro-evidence on green credit as an ex ante risk mitigation tool remains limited. This study examined whether green credit ratios reduce banks’ climate-risk disclosure, the financing-constraint relief channel, and fintech’s amplifying role. Using an unbalanced panel (2008–2023) of 42 Chinese listed banks and a 98-word climate-risk dictionary, we measured disclosure intensity through textual analysis of annual reports. Notably, a 1-percentage-point increase in green credit reduces climate-risk disclosure by 4.4 basis points. Financing-constraint relief accounts for 2.6 % of this effect while fintech depth almost doubles the marginal impact. These findings remain robust across lagged specifications, stepwise controls, ownership heterogeneity, and alternative variable definitions. This study provides empirical evidence on green credit’s risk-buffering role and offers policy insights for regulators to design channel-based capital incentives that reward verifiable climate-risk reduction instead of cosmetic green-washing.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Zhanyang & Zhao, Jiaojiao, 2026. "Green credit as ex ante climate-risk mitigation: Financing constraints, fintech amplification, and textual evidence from Chinese banks," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:95:y:2026:i:c:s1544612326002564
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2026.109725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612326002564
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2026.109725?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:95:y:2026:i:c:s1544612326002564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.