IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v91y2026ics1544612325027114.html

Can machine learning uncover ESG alpha in the Chinese A-share market? An 'alpha illusion' case study

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Borong

Abstract

This study investigates whether Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors can generate alpha in the Chinese A-share market, a market characterized by nascent ESG integration and distinct investor behavior. Using data from 2010 to 2023, we find that raw ESG scores fail to predict stock returns. In contrast, an ESG factor constructed using machine learning (ML), particularly XGBoost, exhibits a highly significant Fama-MacBeth coefficient of 2.122 (t = 11.98). However, this seemingly robust alpha is an illusion. Interpretability analysis reveals that the ML model’s predictive power stems almost entirely from its non-linear capture of traditional factors like illiquidity, size, and value, with the ESG signal contributing virtually nothing. The strategy's profitability relies on high-frequency trading and short-selling, making it unfeasible in practice. Causal inference based on China's carbon market launch confirms that policy shocks failed to activate a genuine ESG pricing mechanism. We conclude that the "ESG alpha" identified by ML is a repackaging of known anomalies—an "alpha illusion"—highlighting the critical distinction between statistical significance and true economic value.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Borong, 2026. "Can machine learning uncover ESG alpha in the Chinese A-share market? An 'alpha illusion' case study," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:91:y:2026:i:c:s1544612325027114
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.109462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325027114
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.109462?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:91:y:2026:i:c:s1544612325027114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.