IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v90y2026ics1544612325025590.html

The impact of competition policy on corporate financialization: A quasi-natural experiment based on the anti-monopoly law

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Yilin
  • Jiang, Xi

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China, enacted in 2008, as a quasi-natural experiment.Based on data from non-financial listed companies in China's A-share market from 2007 to 2023, it systematically examines the impact of competition policy on corporate financialization and its underlying mechanisms. The study finds that competition policy suppresses corporate financialization; there are significant differences in the suppression effect of competition policy on corporate financialization between high-cash-flow and low-cash-flow firms; financing constraints play a significant mediating role in the relationship between competition policy and corporate financialization; and investment opportunities in the main business also serve as a significant mediating factor in this relationship. This research provides new empirical evidence to assess the microeconomic consequences of the Anti-Monopoly Law from the unique perspective of corporate financialization and offers profound policy implications on how to optimize the market competition environment to guide real enterprises to "return to their main business."

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Yilin & Jiang, Xi, 2026. "The impact of competition policy on corporate financialization: A quasi-natural experiment based on the anti-monopoly law," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:90:y:2026:i:c:s1544612325025590
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.109310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325025590
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.109310?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:90:y:2026:i:c:s1544612325025590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.