IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v86y2025ipds1544612325019014.html

Does ESG performance promote new quality productivity forces for firms? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Sun, Yiwan
  • Jiao, Haoxuan
  • Sheng, Dachen

Abstract

This study investigates the influence and mechanisms of environment, society and governance (ESG) performance on firms' high-quality development by introducing new quality productivity forces (NQPF), a novel measure that is superior to traditional total factor productivity (TFP). We employ the entropy method to estimate NQPF and reconfirm our findings using principal component analysis (PCA). The evidence demonstrates that ESG performance significantly encourages firms' investment in research and development (R&D), decreases intermediate product costs (IPCs), and increases institutional shareholding ratios (ISRs), collectively driving notable improvements in NQPF. Further analysis reveals that the positive impact of ESG performance on NQPF decreases returns. ESG performance is particularly pronounced in firms that have lower transparency, smaller size, and nonstate ownership. This diminishing return suggests that policy-makers should provide greater support for firms continuously targeting higher ESG standards to balance the smaller marginal gains accrued from ESG investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Sun, Yiwan & Jiao, Haoxuan & Sheng, Dachen, 2025. "Does ESG performance promote new quality productivity forces for firms? Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PD).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:86:y:2025:i:pd:s1544612325019014
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.108647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325019014
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108647?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:86:y:2025:i:pd:s1544612325019014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.