IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v86y2025ipcs1544612325017921.html

The impact of discrepancies in ESG ratings and institutional investors' shareholding on corporate sustainability development

Author

Listed:
  • Shang, Tian
  • Song, Gongyu
  • Yu, Yijia
  • Wei, Yi

Abstract

This paper conducts an empirical analysis based on data from non-financial listed companies in China from 2010 to 2023, exploring in depth the impact mechanism of ESG rating discrepancies and institutional investors' shareholding on corporate sustainable development. The research findings indicate that ESG rating discrepancies significantly hinder corporate sustainable development, while institutional investors' shareholding demonstrates a notable positive effect on sustainable development. Further analysis reveals that institutional investors' shareholding plays an important moderating role between ESG rating discrepancies and corporate sustainable development, with a significant difference in this moderating effect between high-tech and non-high-tech enterprises. Additionally, the degree of impact of ESG rating discrepancies on corporate sustainable development shows significant differences between high-tech and non-high-tech enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Shang, Tian & Song, Gongyu & Yu, Yijia & Wei, Yi, 2025. "The impact of discrepancies in ESG ratings and institutional investors' shareholding on corporate sustainability development," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PC).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:86:y:2025:i:pc:s1544612325017921
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.108538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325017921
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108538?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:86:y:2025:i:pc:s1544612325017921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.