IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v85y2025ipcs1544612325013601.html

ESG indicators and sectoral volatility: GARCH vs. hybrid machine learning

Author

Listed:
  • Borkowski, Przemyslaw
  • Abdullazade, Zaur

Abstract

This study examines the influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors on sectoral stock volatility using a combination of econometric and machine learning models. ESG indicators are incorporated into the mean equations of univariate and multivariate GARCH models to analyze sector-specific volatility dynamics and spillover effects. To capture time-varying correlations between sectors, we employ the Dynamic Conditional Correlation (DCC) MGARCH model, while a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network is used to enhance return predictions by detecting nonlinear dependencies and long-range volatility patterns. Our findings indicate that ESG factors significantly affect sectoral volatility, with pronounced spillover effects in Financial and Industrial sectors. Although the hybrid MGARCH-DCC and LSTM framework provides deeper insights into ESG-driven volatility transmission, it does not outperform the MGARCH model in predictive accuracy. These results reaffirm the robustness of econometric approaches in modeling sectoral volatility while highlighting the growing importance of ESG factors in financial risk assessment. Investors and policymakers must recognize ESG-driven volatility spillovers when designing risk management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Borkowski, Przemyslaw & Abdullazade, Zaur, 2025. "ESG indicators and sectoral volatility: GARCH vs. hybrid machine learning," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PC).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:85:y:2025:i:pc:s1544612325013601
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.108103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325013601
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:85:y:2025:i:pc:s1544612325013601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.