IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v82y2025ics1544612325008839.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-response bias in expectation surveys: Different perceptions and expectations of financial matters from “early quitters”

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Ruichen

Abstract

This study demonstrates that non-response bias drives selective sample attrition in expectation surveys that require consecutive household responses. Examining 160,842 responses from 20,963 respondents in the Survey of Consumer Expectations (SCE) from June 2013 to April 2024, I show that 66.1 % of respondents who quit the consecutive survey before the completion of 12 tenures—the early quitters—only contributed 44.6 % of total responses. On average, they are 3.2 years younger, have a 5.14 % higher proportion of females, and exhibit lower numerical ability and education level than other respondents. I construct a regression model to demonstrate that early quitters possess significantly different perceptions and expectations regarding personal, household, and national financial and economic matters when responding to SCE. Notably, the early quitters have more positive expectations regarding changes in their financial situation for the next year. They exhibit more negative perceptions of changes in loan difficulty in the U.S. over the past year and hold more pessimistic expectations for changes in loan difficulty in the U.S. for the next year. They anticipate a higher probability of an increased unemployment rate in the U.S. for the next year. All the above results are irrespective of whether the regressions are unweighted or weighted. The non-response bias renders the survey data ungeneralizable, and the weighting applied by SCE does not solve this bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Ruichen, 2025. "Non-response bias in expectation surveys: Different perceptions and expectations of financial matters from “early quitters”," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s1544612325008839
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.107624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325008839
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
    • D84 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Expectations; Speculations
    • G40 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s1544612325008839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.