IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v81y2025ics1544612325006300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of voluntary environmental and social disclosure in mitigating ESG Rating divergence

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Xinyi
  • Khurram, Muhammad Usman
  • Moussa, Faten
  • Jiang, Yuexiang

Abstract

The paper examines whether and how firms voluntary disclosures on environmental and social (E&S) responsibility mitigate ESG rating divergence. For this purpose, we employ a panel regression model, endogeneity analysis, moderating effect test (public attention), and heterogeneity analysis (quality of information disclosure and corporate governance, external assurance, and greenwashing). (1) Based on the results, we find that E&S voluntary disclosures effectively reduce ESG rating divergence and extra public attention (analysts, media, and institutional investors) can strengthen this effect in China during 2018–2022. Our results are robust after addressing the endogeneity problems, employing alternate proxies, and several additional tests. (2) Our results are more pronounced for firms with higher disclosure quality and better governance practices, assured by external auditors and complied with GRI standards. (3) Conversely, greenwashing practices and compromised information quality can inadvertently increase disagreements among ESG raters. Our study provides valuable insights for policymakers, investors, and corporate practitioners seeking to promote transparency, accountability, and sustainability in the global marketplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Xinyi & Khurram, Muhammad Usman & Moussa, Faten & Jiang, Yuexiang, 2025. "The role of voluntary environmental and social disclosure in mitigating ESG Rating divergence," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:81:y:2025:i:c:s1544612325006300
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.107370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325006300
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107370?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:81:y:2025:i:c:s1544612325006300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.