IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v80y2025ics1544612325005951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do generalist CEOs undermine financial statement comparability?

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Kyeongmin

Abstract

This study examines whether Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) with broader career experience, referred to as generalist CEOs, undermine financial statement comparability. Drawing on 25,177 U.S. public firm-year observations from 1992 to 2022, our main result indicates that a more generalist CEO is linked to lower comparability in corporate reporting. Furthermore, newly appointed CEOs reinforce this negative relationship, particularly when the incoming CEOs are generalists. The mechanism tests reveal that increased earnings management, leverage, and intangible capital partly explain the negative relationship between generalist CEOs and financial statement comparability. Additional analyses indicate that factors such as managerial ability, product market fluidity, and Tobin's Q can amplify the negative effect of the General Ability Index (GAI), whereas having high comparability peers mitigates it. Using propensity score matching, entropy balancing, a coefficient stability test, and an instrumental variable approach, we address omitted variable bias and enhance the causal interpretation. Overall, our findings suggest that generalist CEOs undermine financial reporting uniformity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Kyeongmin, 2025. "Do generalist CEOs undermine financial statement comparability?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:80:y:2025:i:c:s1544612325005951
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2025.107332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325005951
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:80:y:2025:i:c:s1544612325005951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.