IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v103y2026ics1544612326006914.html

Responsibility in the shadows: How does firms’ shadow banking reshape carbon emission performance?

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Wenting
  • Lin, Ruxing
  • Ma, Guangcheng

Abstract

This paper systematically reviews theories of financing constraints and resource allocation, and constructs a theoretical framework for the relationship between corporate shadow banking and carbon emissions performance. An empirical analysis is conducted using a sample of A-share listed firms in China from 2007 to 2023. The study finds that corporate shadow banking can significantly improve carbon emission performance. Robustness tests, including replacing proxy variables, adjusting the sample range, and using instrumental variable regression, confirm the validity of these conclusions. Mechanism analysis identifies four competing pathways: green R&D investment and environmental equipment investment serve as positive channels, while financial asset allocation and high-pollution capacity expansion generate negative effects. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the positive effect is stronger among firms facing tighter financing constraints, stricter environmental regulation, high regional financial development, and faster industry growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Wenting & Lin, Ruxing & Ma, Guangcheng, 2026. "Responsibility in the shadows: How does firms’ shadow banking reshape carbon emission performance?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:103:y:2026:i:c:s1544612326006914
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2026.110163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612326006914
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2026.110163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:103:y:2026:i:c:s1544612326006914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.