Author
Listed:
- Zhou, Bingyu
- Gao, Yubin
- Sheng, Jin
Abstract
Based on the panel data of Chinese cities from 2010 to 2023, this study constructs a difference-in-differences model to systematically evaluate the causal effect of low-altitude economic policies on regional entrepreneurial activities and the mechanism of their impact. The study selects the national low-altitude economic pilot policies as a quasi-natural experiment and uses the multi-period difference-in-differences method for empirical testing. The study finds that low-altitude economic policies significantly enhance the entrepreneurial activity in the pilot areas. This conclusion remains valid after undergoing a series of robustness tests such as parallel trend test, placebo test, replacement of dependent variables, and control of potential confounding factors. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the policy effect is more significant in areas with net population inflow, large-scale cities, and higher social security levels. Mechanism testing reveals that low-altitude economic policies mainly promote entrepreneurial activities through the intermediary channel of fiscal investment expansion, that is, the implementation of the policy leads to an increase in government special fiscal expenditures, the improvement of low-altitude infrastructure and the cultivation of industrial chain supporting enterprises, thereby reducing entrepreneurial costs and optimizing the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Further analysis reveals that the regional marketization level plays a significant positive regulatory role in this process. The higher the degree of marketization, the better the allocation efficiency of fiscal investment, and the more obvious the policy's promotion effect on entrepreneurship. This indicates that the institutional environment is an important boundary condition for the release of policy effectiveness.
Suggested Citation
Zhou, Bingyu & Gao, Yubin & Sheng, Jin, 2026.
"Low-altitude economic policies and entrepreneurial activity: Policy push or market pull?,"
Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:finlet:v:102:y:2026:i:c:s1544612326006112
DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2026.110082
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:102:y:2026:i:c:s1544612326006112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.