IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v100y2026ics1544612326005350.html

Social media echo chambers and stock price volatility: Evidence from Chinese investor forums

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Jianxiang
  • Wang, Maoguang
  • Xia, Xinzi

Abstract

This paper investigates whether social media echo chambers amplify stock price volatility. Using 42 million posts from Eastmoney Guba and 186,542 firm-month observations from the Chinese A-share market over 2014 to 2023, we construct a Sentiment Homogeneity Index (SHI) based on semantic similarity to measure opinion convergence. We find that higher sentiment homogenization significantly increases subsequent idiosyncratic volatility. The effect is asymmetric: bearish echo chambers exert a stronger impact than bullish ones, consistent with loss aversion and short-sale constraints. The effect intensifies for stocks with higher retail ownership, lower analyst coverage, and smaller capitalization, supporting the joint hypothesis of sentiment and limits to arbitrage. Mechanism analysis confirms that echo chambers amplify volatility through order flow imbalance. This study contributes to the social media and asset pricing literature by showing that opinion homogeneity, rather than sentiment level alone, provides incremental information for understanding volatility dynamics in retail-dominated markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Jianxiang & Wang, Maoguang & Xia, Xinzi, 2026. "Social media echo chambers and stock price volatility: Evidence from Chinese investor forums," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:100:y:2026:i:c:s1544612326005350
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2026.110006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612326005350
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2026.110006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:100:y:2026:i:c:s1544612326005350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.