IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v106y2025ics1057521925006623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Embracing paradox: The digital innovation strategy and corporate value—The moderating role of CEO-TMT cognitive complementarity and executive equity incentives

Author

Listed:
  • Cao, Linjun
  • Wu, Lidong

Abstract

Overcoming the tension between exploration and exploitation in digital innovation is critical for realizing firm value. Although existing research recognizes this tension as a major obstacle to value creation, long-term empirical studies on strategies to address it remain scarce. To bridge this gap, we draw on paradox theory, ambidextrous innovation, and strategic flexibility and leverage a panel of non-financial A-share listed firms in China to examine how synergistic yet flexible digital innovation strategies contribute to firm value. Our findings indicate that these strategies effectively manage the innovation paradox and enhance value creation, with particularly strong effects when the chief executive officer and top management team exhibit high cognitive complementarity and are motivated by long-term equity incentives. Moreover, the value-enhancing impact of digital innovation strategies is more pronounced for firms operating in regions with strong intellectual property protection and for those subject to high analyst coverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Cao, Linjun & Wu, Lidong, 2025. "Embracing paradox: The digital innovation strategy and corporate value—The moderating role of CEO-TMT cognitive complementarity and executive equity incentives," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925006623
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925006623
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104575?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925006623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.