IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v106y2025ics1057521925006611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does green finance influence enterprise greenwashing tendencies? Theoretical and empirical evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Liang, Qianxu
  • Wang, Chaonan
  • Li, Yongping

Abstract

As green finance emerges as a critical institutional mechanism for directing capital toward sustainable development, increased attention has been paid to the authenticity of corporate environmental disclosures. The widespread occurrence of greenwashing not only weakens the effectiveness of policy tools but also distorts the capital market's assessment of firms' environmental performance. Using panel data from Chinese A-share listed companies spanning 2010–2023, this study employs a two-way fixed effects model to systematically examine the impact of green finance development on corporate greenwashing tendencies. The empirical results demonstrate that green finance significantly reduces the likelihood of greenwashing. Mechanism analysis reveals that this effect primarily operates through three channels: lowering green agency costs, alleviating financing constraints, and enhancing managerial awareness of environmental issues. Heterogeneity analyses indicate that the inhibitory effect of green finance is more pronounced among state-owned enterprises, firms in regions with stricter environmental regulation, and those with greater analyst coverage. Overall, this study provides robust microlevel evidence on the behavioral impact of green finance on firms' practices and offers valuable theoretical and policy implications for designing more effective and targeted green finance frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang, Qianxu & Wang, Chaonan & Li, Yongping, 2025. "How does green finance influence enterprise greenwashing tendencies? Theoretical and empirical evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925006611
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925006611
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104574?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925006611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.