Author
Listed:
- Wang, Wenyi
- Liu, Haifei
- Wang, Lei
- Che, Zhen
Abstract
This study analyzes the formation and contagion mechanism of liquidity risk under the synergistic effect of the government, high‑carbon manufacturing enterprises, and investors from a multi-agent behavioral constraints perspective. We construct a business association network using multilayer network theory and a liquidity risk contagion model for high‑carbon manufacturing enterprises based on mean-field theory and the epidemic model to analyze the contagion law of liquidity risk through simulation. There are two aspects to the findings of this study. (1) Although a single regulation of multi-agent behavioral constraints for the government, high‑carbon manufacturing enterprises, and investors may reduce the probability of high‑carbon manufacturing businesses' liquidity risk contagion, the required conditions are highly stringent. The gradual elimination of high‑carbon manufacturing enterprises' liquidity risk contagion can be effectively achieved by comprehensively regulating the factors of multi-agent behavioral constraints. (2) For liquidity risk contagion intensity, policy change radicality, carbon regulation uncertainty, and technological application complexity have global reinforcement effects on other factors. In comparison to the multilayer business association network, the single-layer network tends to overestimate the extent of liquidity risk contagion between high‑carbon manufacturing enterprises. This study can not only provide decision-making basis for high‑carbon manufacturing enterprises to orderly promote low-carbon transformation, but also provide reference for the government to formulate efficient liquidity risk contagion prevention and control strategies from the perspective of multi-agent behavioral constraints.
Suggested Citation
Wang, Wenyi & Liu, Haifei & Wang, Lei & Che, Zhen, 2025.
"Networked liquidity risk contagion in high-carbon sectors: The role of multi-agent behavioral constraints,"
International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:finana:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925006179
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104530
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925006179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.