IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v106y2025ics1057521925006167.html

Can Industry-Specific Information Disclosure Guidelines Alleviate Corporate ESG Divergence? Evidence from Chinese List Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Kong, Linghui
  • Chen, Rongquan
  • Huang, Xinyu
  • Wang, Fan

Abstract

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings are important for measuring enterprises' sustainable development performance. Disagreements between different rating agencies concerning ESG ratings can affect stakeholders' investment decisions, impacting capital market and resource allocation efficiency. This paper uses data of listed companies from 2015 to 2021 and, based on the quasi-natural experiment of China's Industry-specific Information Disclosure Guidelines (IIDGs), constructs a multi-period Difference-in-Differences (DID) model to explore the impact of the new IIDG model in the capital market on divergences in corporate ESG ratings and its underlying mechanisms. Results reveal that IIDGs can significantly reduce enterprises' ESG ratings divergence, and subsequent robustness tests support this conclusion. Mechanism analysis indicates that this effect is primarily achieved by enhancing the information disclosure effect and mitigating the rater effect. Further analysis reveals that third-party institutions' verification of corporate social responsibility reports helps IIDGs reduce enterprises' ESG ratings divergence. Heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that due to enterprises' differing emphasis on environmental and sustainable development information, IIDGs have a more significant effect in reducing ESG ratings divergence for those that disclose environmental and sustainable development reports. However, IIDGs achieve a more significant effect in reducing ESG ratings divergence for enterprises audited by one of the Big Four accounting firms, considering financial information audited by them are considered more trustworthy. This study demonstrates that the industry-specific information disclosure regulatory framework significantly reduces ESG ratings divergence and provides valuable insights for designing information disclosure regulatory models to address ESG ratings divergence.

Suggested Citation

  • Kong, Linghui & Chen, Rongquan & Huang, Xinyu & Wang, Fan, 2025. "Can Industry-Specific Information Disclosure Guidelines Alleviate Corporate ESG Divergence? Evidence from Chinese List Companies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925006167
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925006167
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Zhihe & Yu, Zaishui & Yao, Chengyu & Zhang, Zerui, 2025. "Environmental policy orientation and corporate green transformation: A study based on information disclosure perspective," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Chen, Gaocai & Zou, Mengqi, 2025. "Industry-specific information disclosure regulation and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Saeid Homayoun, 2020. "Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Christopher Marquis & Michael W. Toffel & Yanhua Zhou, 2016. "Scrutiny, Norms, and Selective Disclosure: A Global Study of Greenwashing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 483-504, April.
    5. Guifeng Shi, 2022. "Does industry-specific information disclosure improve trade credit financing?," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 203-227, April.
    6. Yong Shi & Tongsheng Yao, 2025. "ESG Rating Divergence: Existence, Driving Factors, and Impact Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.
    7. Li, Xinge & Chang, Zheren & Qi, Jiangyi, 2025. "Foreign investment policy, market entry and corporate ESG performance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Zheng, Jing & Zou, Mengqi, 2025. "Can industry-specific information disclosure regulation mitigate the bullwhip effect in supply chain? Evidence from Chinese listed companies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Paolo Perego & Ans Kolk, 2012. "Multinationals’ Accountability on Sustainability: The Evolution of Third-party Assurance of Sustainability Reports," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 173-190, October.
    10. Hirshleifer, David & Teoh, Siew Hong, 2003. "Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1-3), pages 337-386, December.
    11. Ling, Shixian & Xia, Hui & Liu, Zhangxin (Frank), 2024. "ESG rating divergence and audit fees: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    12. Dumrose, Maurice & Rink, Sebastian & Eckert, Julia, 2022. "Disaggregating confusion? The EU Taxonomy and its relation to ESG rating," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    13. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    14. Magali Delmas & Maria J. Montes‐Sancho & Jay P. Shimshack, 2010. "Information Disclosure Policies: Evidence From The Electricity Industry," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 48(2), pages 483-498, April.
    15. Sayyad, Dr. Munawar & Bhattacharjee, Dr. Kaushik & Pathak, Dr. Rajesh, 2025. "Does good corporate governance reduce cost of mutual fund investments: An emerging market perspective," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    16. P. Raghavendra Rau & Ting Yu, 2023. "A survey on ESG: investors, institutions and firms," China Finance Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(1), pages 3-33, January.
    17. Li, Na & Shi, Guifeng & Guo, Ping & Wu, Yanqin & Zhuo, Weijia, 2025. "Does mandatory operating information disclosure affect corporate earnings management? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 768-790.
    18. Wang, Haijun & Jiao, Shuaipeng & Ge, Chen & Sun, Guanglin, 2024. "Corporate ESG rating divergence and excess stock returns," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    19. Oz Shy, 1996. "Industrial Organization: Theory and Applications," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262691795, December.
    20. Lv, Yan & Wang, Fan & Liu, Guoliang & Ren, Ruixue, 2024. "The impact of environmental court construction on the quality of corporate environmental information disclosure," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PC).
    21. Athey, Susan & Imbens, Guido W., 2022. "Design-based analysis in Difference-In-Differences settings with staggered adoption," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 226(1), pages 62-79.
    22. Horky, Florian & Pasquali, Andrea & Magazzino, Cosimo, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement portfolios – Evidence from the EuroStoxx 600," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PA).
    23. Rajna Gibson Brandon & Philipp Krueger & Peter Steffen Schmidt, 2021. "ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(4), pages 104-127, October.
    24. Vincenzo Capizzi & Eleonora Gioia & Giancarlo Giudici & Francesca Tenca, 2021. "The Divergence Of Esg Ratings: An Analysis Of Italian Listed Companies," Journal of Financial Management, Markets and Institutions (JFMMI), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(02), pages 1-21, December.
    25. Ilze Zumente & Nataļja Lāce, 2021. "ESG Rating—Necessity for the Investor or the Company?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    26. Nicole Darnall & Hyunjung Ji & Kazuyuki Iwata & Toshi H. Arimura, 2022. "Do ESG reporting guidelines and verifications enhance firms' information disclosure?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1214-1230, September.
    27. Sakis Kotsantonis & George Serafeim, 2019. "Four Things No One Will Tell You About ESG Data," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 31(2), pages 50-58, June.
    28. Anselmi, Giulio & Petrella, Giovanni, 2025. "ESG ratings: Disagreement across providers and effects on stock returns," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    29. Wang, Xiaoying & Li, Yi & Fu, Chaoqian & Yue, Zhenbang, 2025. "Does CEO competence affect enterprises’ financial performance?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    30. Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, Emawtee & Bennett, Scott & Lehnherr, Rob & Zhong, Angel, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement: Implications and aggregation approaches," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    31. Touti, Nihal & Taïb, Asmâa Alaoui & Rekik, Lilia, 2025. "Emerging trends in ESG ratings as risk factors in asset pricing," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    32. Luluk Widyawati, 2021. "Measurement concerns and agreement of environmental social governance ratings," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 1589-1623, April.
    33. Zhihong Mao & Siyang Wang & Yu‐En Lin, 2024. "ESG, ESG rating divergence and earnings management: Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3328-3347, July.
    34. J. Anthony Cookson & Marina Niessner, 2020. "Why Don't We Agree? Evidence from a Social Network of Investors," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(1), pages 173-228, February.
    35. Liu, Xiangqiang & Dai, Jiajie & Dong, Xiaohong & Liu, Jia, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and analyst forecast quality," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    36. Aaron K. Chatterji & Rodolphe Durand & David I. Levine & Samuel Touboul, 2016. "Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1597-1614, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qian, Ming & Wei, Zeyi & Bai, Ruobing, 2025. "Does ESG narrative specificity mitigate rating disagreement? evidence from ESG reports in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xue & Liu, Qingyuan, 2024. "Information disclosure and ESG rating disagreement: Evidence from green bond issuance in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Hu, Yucen & Wang, Yuxin, 2026. "The impact of ESG rating divergence on supply chain resilience: The threshold effect of corporate information transparency," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    3. Yong Shi & Tongsheng Yao, 2025. "ESG Rating Divergence: Existence, Driving Factors, and Impact Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Wang, Wenjiao & Sun, Ziyuan & Wang, Lan, 2025. "Does ESG rating divergence exacerbate management tone manipulation? − Empirical evidence based on MD&A text," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    5. Michele Rubino & Ilaria Mastrorocco & Giovanni Maria Garegnani, 2024. "The influence of market and institutional factors on ESG rating disagreement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3916-3926, September.
    6. Chen, Jingpeng & Lin, Haiying, 2026. "Corporate digitalization and ESG rating divergence: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Minghua Dong & Miaomiao Li & Hongxia Wang & Yuanyuan Pang, 2025. "ESG Disagreement and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 32(1), pages 267-299, March.
    8. Sun, Guanglin & Yan, Zian & Gong, Zejun & Li, Mengding, 2025. "The impact of ESG rating divergence on stock price crash risk," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    9. Kurbus, Barbara & Rant, Vasja, 2025. "A legal origins perspective on ESG rating disagreement," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    10. Lou, Zhukun & Li, Sujie & Tong, Jingyi & Zhao, Jing, 2025. "ESG rating disagreement and the cost of equity capital," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    11. Cheng, Louis T.W. & Cheong, Tsun Se & Wojewodzki, Michal & Chui, David, 2025. "The effect of ESG divergence on the financial performance of Hong Kong-listed firms: An artificial neural network approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    12. Mathias Payer & Martin Schüder & Tanja Gemünden & Henning Zülch, 2025. "Aligning ESG ratings with cultural values: a framework for the German-speaking region," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Ju, Chunhua & Fang, Xusheng & Shen, Zhonghua, 2025. "ESG rating divergence and stock price crash risk," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    14. Lin, Yu-En & Teng, Shi & Yu, Bo & Lam, Keith S.K., 2025. "ESG rating, rating divergence and investment efficiency: International evidence," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    15. Zhang, Cheng & Zha, Qianyao & Sun, Xun & Chen, Liping, 2024. "Does ESG rating disagreement affect audit opinions?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    16. Yin, Libo & Zhu, Xiaoye & Su, Zhi & Guo, Hongliang, 2025. "Is disagreement beneficial for market efficiency? Evidence from ESG ratings," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Xinyue Zhang & Yuan George Shan & Yuming Zhang & Chao Xing, 2025. "Does ESG rating divergence affect the cost of corporate debt?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(3), pages 2244-2280, September.
    18. Qian, Ming & Wei, Zeyi & Bai, Ruobing, 2025. "Does ESG narrative specificity mitigate rating disagreement? evidence from ESG reports in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    19. Ruan, Lei & Li, Jianing & Huang, Siqi, 2025. "ESG rating adjustment and capital market pricing efficiency: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    20. Teng, Huiyang & Zhang, Jiawei & Li, Xiaoshuo & Li, Bin, 2025. "ESG rating divergence and future corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 108(PB).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925006167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.