Author
Listed:
- Kong, Linghui
- Chen, Rongquan
- Huang, Xinyu
- Wang, Fan
Abstract
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings are important for measuring enterprises' sustainable development performance. Disagreements between different rating agencies concerning ESG ratings can affect stakeholders' investment decisions, impacting capital market and resource allocation efficiency. This paper uses data of listed companies from 2015 to 2021 and, based on the quasi-natural experiment of China's Industry-specific Information Disclosure Guidelines (IIDGs), constructs a multi-period Difference-in-Differences (DID) model to explore the impact of the new IIDG model in the capital market on divergences in corporate ESG ratings and its underlying mechanisms. Results reveal that IIDGs can significantly reduce enterprises' ESG ratings divergence, and subsequent robustness tests support this conclusion. Mechanism analysis indicates that this effect is primarily achieved by enhancing the information disclosure effect and mitigating the rater effect. Further analysis reveals that third-party institutions' verification of corporate social responsibility reports helps IIDGs reduce enterprises' ESG ratings divergence. Heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that due to enterprises' differing emphasis on environmental and sustainable development information, IIDGs have a more significant effect in reducing ESG ratings divergence for those that disclose environmental and sustainable development reports. However, IIDGs achieve a more significant effect in reducing ESG ratings divergence for enterprises audited by one of the Big Four accounting firms, considering financial information audited by them are considered more trustworthy. This study demonstrates that the industry-specific information disclosure regulatory framework significantly reduces ESG ratings divergence and provides valuable insights for designing information disclosure regulatory models to address ESG ratings divergence.
Suggested Citation
Kong, Linghui & Chen, Rongquan & Huang, Xinyu & Wang, Fan, 2025.
"Can Industry-Specific Information Disclosure Guidelines Alleviate Corporate ESG Divergence? Evidence from Chinese List Companies,"
International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:finana:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925006167
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104529
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925006167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.