IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v106y2025ics1057521925005587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collateral reform and firm value: Empirical evidence from the natural experiment of civil code of the PRC

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Shuwen
  • Yang, Ruiqi
  • Li, Yanru

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of collateral law reform, marked by the promulgation of the Civil Code, on firm value using a difference-in-differences (DID) approach. The empirical results indicate that the reform of property rights law associated with the Civil Code leads to a short-term decline in firms' market value. Mechanism analysis reveals that the reform reduces firm value by increasing agency costs and tightening financing constraints. Heterogeneity analysis further shows that the negative impact of the collateral reform on firm size value is significantly more pronouneed for private enterprises than for state-owned firms, there is no significant difference in the coefficient values of firm profit value. However, the regional heterogeneity of the reform's effects is not statistically significant, suggesting that the impact on firm value does not vary significantly across different geographic regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Shuwen & Yang, Ruiqi & Li, Yanru, 2025. "Collateral reform and firm value: Empirical evidence from the natural experiment of civil code of the PRC," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925005587
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925005587
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:106:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925005587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.