IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v104y2025ipas1057521925004156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Executive retirement plan freezes and firm policies

Author

Listed:
  • Petrou, Zacharias
  • Vlittis, Adamos

Abstract

When firms freeze their employees qualified defined benefit (DB) pension plans, they often re-evaluate and may similarly freeze their non-qualified supplemental executive retirement plans (SERPs). This study draws from agency theory to investigate the determinants and consequences of SERP freezes. We find that the decision to freeze SERPs is predominantly influenced by the power dynamics between top executives and the board of directors, alongside talent retention concerns. Moreover, our analysis reveals that SERP freezes lead to significant changes in corporate behavior. Firms that implement these freezes tend to distribute pension-related cost savings to their shareholders and are less likely to pursue diversification strategies than firms that keep their SERPs open. This risk-shifting behavior manifests in lower equity and higher credit risk post-freeze. Overall, this study provides insights into the determinants of SERP freezes and enhances our understanding of the incentive alignment function of SERPs' within top executives' compensation structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Petrou, Zacharias & Vlittis, Adamos, 2025. "Executive retirement plan freezes and firm policies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:104:y:2025:i:pa:s1057521925004156
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925004156
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:104:y:2025:i:pa:s1057521925004156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.