IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v104y2025ipas1057521925003722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investor–firm interactions versus investor–investor interactions: Which enhances investor learning better?

Author

Listed:
  • Yin, Libo
  • Zhu, Xiaoye

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of different forms of information interaction on investor learning. The empirical results show that investor–firm interactions are positively associated with the investor learning effect, whereas investor–investor interactions exert a negative impact. The mechanism analysis suggests that acquiring information from the supply side (firms) rather than the demand side (investors) reduces noise content, investor disagreement, and crash risk, thereby enhancing investor learning. This study enhances our understanding of how improving the market information environment, refining corporate disclosure practices, and strengthening investor protection can enhance investor learning in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Yin, Libo & Zhu, Xiaoye, 2025. "Investor–firm interactions versus investor–investor interactions: Which enhances investor learning better?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:104:y:2025:i:pa:s1057521925003722
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925003722
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104285?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:104:y:2025:i:pa:s1057521925003722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.