IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v103y2025ics1057521925002741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geopolitical risk and energy markets in China

Author

Listed:
  • Su, Xiaomei
  • Razi, Ummara
  • Zhao, Shangmei
  • Li, Wei
  • Gu, Xiao
  • Yan, Jiale

Abstract

We examine the impact of geopolitical risk (GPR) on China's energy markets, focusing on carbon emission allowance prices, the clean energy stock index, the environmental–social–governance (ESG) 100 stock index, and the gas and oil stock index. Using a quantile-on-quantile regression with kernel regularized least squares methodology, we analyze weekly data from China from March 2, 2015, to December 26, 2022. Findings reveal that GPR negatively affects carbon market prices and ESG stocks, particularly when these markets are in weaker states. Conversely, clean energy stocks benefit from geopolitical uncertainties under favorable market conditions, while traditional energy stocks exhibit resilience and even strengthen due to their strategic importance during periods of heightened GPR. Moreover, GPR significantly drives energy market volatility, with amplified effects in high-volatility market conditions. This quantile-specific approach provides a nuanced understanding of how GPR influences energy assets, emphasizing the importance of tailored risk management strategies. Our findings highlight the necessity of integrating GPR assessments into investment decisions and policy frameworks to reduce the uncertainty affecting China's energy markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Su, Xiaomei & Razi, Ummara & Zhao, Shangmei & Li, Wei & Gu, Xiao & Yan, Jiale, 2025. "Geopolitical risk and energy markets in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:103:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925002741
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925002741
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:103:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925002741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.