IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v103y2025ics1057521925002327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholders and regulatory pressure on ESG disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Bolognesi, Enrica
  • Burchi, Alberto
  • Goodell, John W.
  • Paltrinieri, Andrea

Abstract

We focus on the impact of stakeholders' pressure on the levels of ESG transparency exhibited by companies operating under different regulatory frameworks – specifically, within voluntary or mandatory disclosure regimes – between 2012 and 2020. Our analysis encompasses European and US listed companies, each having taken distinct paths toward sustainability reporting. Europe underwent the transition to a mandatory disclosure regime with the implementation of the EU 2014 Non-Financial Reporting Directive, while the US adopted a market-based approach, often referring to disclosure frameworks established by non-governmental entities. Our findings reveal that, under the voluntary disclosure regime, higher pressure toward transparency is primarily driven by employee-oriented and environmentally sensitive companies. However, during the mandatory regime for European firms, regulatory pressure takes the place of the previously exerted pressure by stakeholders. US-listed firms are indirectly impacted by the European regulatory transition, exhibiting heightened levels of pressure on reporting demanded by stakeholders in environmentally sensitive industries, as well as by institutional investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Bolognesi, Enrica & Burchi, Alberto & Goodell, John W. & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2025. "Stakeholders and regulatory pressure on ESG disclosure," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:103:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925002327
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925002327
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:103:y:2025:i:c:s1057521925002327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.