IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v7y1989i4p422-430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the professional self-managing or is there really a need for professional management?

Author

Listed:
  • Weggeman, Mathieu

Abstract

Is the professional self-managing or is there really a need for professional management? The answer to that question is in both cases: "Yes". The professional is largely responsible for directing his own activities. Managers must take due account of this by applying rules and procedures on a modest scale and aiming to achieve maximum harmonisation of the objectives of the organisation and the personal objectives of the people working there. If they can do that then there can be said to be professional management. The difficulty in managing professionals is the difficulty in steering the force and the direction of the thinking of others who are -- by nature - often differently-minded: professionals have generally followed a specialised, usually scientific education, enjoy a high social standing, like to "perform solo", have a dislike of management both in the active and the passive sense and the output of their work is difficult for others to evaluate because there is generally no clear consensus on the definition of performance indicators. Managing professionals could be considered as managing brain capacity and that calls for more than just good sense. A manager of a group of professionals can even sometimes experience a great deal of professional pleasure in his work if he is capable of acting as a specialised generalist, pacemaker and coach for his or her team.

Suggested Citation

  • Weggeman, Mathieu, 1989. "Is the professional self-managing or is there really a need for professional management?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 422-430, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:7:y:1989:i:4:p:422-430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0263237389900790
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:7:y:1989:i:4:p:422-430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.