IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v15y1997i3p303-317.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reinventing strategic management: New theory and practice for competence-based competition

Author

Listed:
  • Sanchez, Ron
  • Heene, Aimé

Abstract

Many industries are now evolving new kinds of competitive environments which are not adequately explained by traditional strategy theory. This article introduces a movement to make strategy theory more relevant to contemporary forms of competition by rethinking both the content and process of strategic management theory and practice. A brief review of major developments in traditional strategy theory suggests that increasing polarization and fragmentation of strategy theory has progressively limited its applicability to the actual practice of strategic management. As a remedy, the movement to build a theory of competence-based strategic management is developing new concepts of competition and cooperation that are adding new dynamic, systemic, cognitive, and holistic dimensions to the theory of strategic management. The goal of the competence movement is building new strategy theory that will 'work' in practice. To this end, the movement advocates reconnecting strategy researchers and strategic managers in an interactive 'double-loop learning' research process. This new approach to developing useful theory for strategic management is now undertaking a reintegration of previously fragmented strategy theory, and in the process is suggesting new approaches to understanding contemporary forms of competence-based competition and management.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanchez, Ron & Heene, Aimé, 1997. "Reinventing strategic management: New theory and practice for competence-based competition," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 303-317, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:15:y:1997:i:3:p:303-317
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237397000108
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:15:y:1997:i:3:p:303-317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.