Author
Listed:
- Goldstein, Bernard D.
- Hudak, Juliann M.
Abstract
Developing effective approaches to increasingly complex global environmental challenges requires understanding and respect for underlying policy differences within and among nations. The defense of property rights against perceived intrusion by governmental authorities has been noted as an environmental policy issue related to specific laws and regulations in the United States, and as a basis for opposition to sustainability. We assessed the extent to which the defense of property rights and opposition to sustainability has become part of mainstream US policy deliberations by evaluating its inclusion within positions of candidates for the presidential nomination of the Republican and Democratic parties and by review of party platforms. We performed a similar review of the positions and platforms of right wing. EU political parties and of positions taken on the Brexit issue. Increasing concern about property rights, including using it as a basis to oppose and overturn sustainability initiatives, was found among the US right wing. This concern was tied to rights granted in the US Constitution and concern about governmental intrusion. In contrast, interference for environmental reasons in the rights of landowners to manage their property does not appear to be a concern of the EU right wing, nor was this issue raised by supporters of Brexit. Although just one of many factors, differences in concern about property rights should be recognized as contributing to EU/US differences in environmental policy.
Suggested Citation
Goldstein, Bernard D. & Hudak, Juliann M., 2017.
"Comparison of the role of property rights in right wing and left wing American and European environmental policy deliberations,"
Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 28-34.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:68:y:2017:i:c:p:28-34
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.012
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:68:y:2017:i:c:p:28-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-science-and-policy/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.