IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enscpo/v66y2016icp260-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of Australian approaches for monitoring, assessing and reporting estuarine condition: I. International context and evaluation criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Hallett, Chris S.
  • Valesini, Fiona
  • Elliott, Mike

Abstract

Given the immeasurable value of estuaries and their severe and growing pressures, sound understanding and reporting of estuarine condition is essential for their effective management and sustainable development. In light of this, we aim to provide a timely and comprehensive three-part review of the approaches currently employed for monitoring, assessing and reporting estuarine condition, focussing on Australian systems. Here, in Part 1, we establish the national and international context of our review and define globally-relevant evaluation criteria against which to assess Australian progress. We achieve this by examining effective monitoring, assessment and reporting programs from around the world and characterising ‘best practice’. We then highlight the Australian historical context and consider recent policies, frameworks, guidelines and legislation relating to the monitoring and reporting of estuarine condition nationwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Hallett, Chris S. & Valesini, Fiona & Elliott, Mike, 2016. "A review of Australian approaches for monitoring, assessing and reporting estuarine condition: I. International context and evaluation criteria," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 260-269.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:66:y:2016:i:c:p:260-269
    DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901116304579
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julia Lanoue, 2020. "Disparate Environmental Monitoring as a Barrier to the Availability and Accessibility of Open Access Data on the Tidal Thames," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:66:y:2016:i:c:p:260-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-science-and-policy/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.