IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enscpo/v56y2016icp49-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimizing air pollution exposure: A practical policy to protect vulnerable older adults from death and disability

Author

Listed:
  • Woodward, Nick
  • Levine, Morgan

Abstract

Air pollution causes an estimated 200,000 deaths per year in the United States alone. Older adults are at greater risk of mortality caused by air pollution. Here we quantify the number of older adult facilities in Los Angeles County who are exposed to high levels of traffic derived air pollution, and propose policy solutions to reduce pollution exposure to this vulnerable subgroup. Distances between 20,362 intersections and 858 elder care facilities were estimated, and roads or highways within 500 of facilities were used to estimate traffic volume exposure. Of the 858 facilities, 54 were located near at least one major roadway, defined as a traffic volume over 100,000 cars per day. These 54 facilities house approximately 6000 older adults. Following standards established for schools, we recommend legislation mandating the placement of new elder care facilities a minimum of 500ft from major roadways in order to reduce unnecessary mortality risk from pollution exposure.

Suggested Citation

  • Woodward, Nick & Levine, Morgan, 2016. "Minimizing air pollution exposure: A practical policy to protect vulnerable older adults from death and disability," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 49-55.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:56:y:2016:i:c:p:49-55
    DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901115301015
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:56:y:2016:i:c:p:49-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-science-and-policy/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.