IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enscpo/v55y2016ip2p345-352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scientist–stakeholder workshops: A collaborative approach for integrating science and decision-making in Austrian flood-prone municipalities

Author

Listed:
  • Löschner, Lukas
  • Nordbeck, Ralf
  • Scherhaufer, Patrick
  • Seher, Walter

Abstract

Both the scientific and decision-making aspects of the nascent paradigm of risk-based flood management are highly complex. While scientists must account for potential future dynamics in flood risk resulting from climate change or settlement growth, decision-makers are urged to consider a host of flood management options and thus face a significantly enlarged decision scope. In light of the complexities that arise from the shift in flood policy, there is a growing need to better integrate science and decision-making and develop an interface to combine different knowledge domains. This paper discusses scientist–stakeholder workshops (SSW) as a collaborative approach within a flood-related Integrated Assessment (IA) to connect the assessment of (flood) risks more closely to the process of policy implementation. We present findings from two SSW conducted as part of the project RiskAdapt in two Austrian flood-prone municipalities with the aim of (i) reflecting the determinants of vulnerability, (ii) identifying local context conditions, (iii) developing adaptive measures for extreme scenarios and thereby (iv) facilitating anticipatory adaptation to flood risk dynamics. We illustrate the potential and constraints of SSW as a participatory method in flood risk management and discuss the possibilities of institutionalizing SSW in the context of the EU Floods Directive implementation in Austria.

Suggested Citation

  • Löschner, Lukas & Nordbeck, Ralf & Scherhaufer, Patrick & Seher, Walter, 2016. "Scientist–stakeholder workshops: A collaborative approach for integrating science and decision-making in Austrian flood-prone municipalities," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(P2), pages 345-352.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:55:y:2016:i:p2:p:345-352
    DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901115300575
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Osei-Kyei & Vivian W. Y. Tam & Ursa Komac & Godslove Ampratwum, 2023. "Review of the Relationship Management Strategies for Building Flood Disaster Resilience through Public–Private Partnership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Philipp Preuner & Anna Scolobig & JoAnne Linnerooth Bayer & David Ottowitz & Stefan Hoyer & Birgit Jochum, 2017. "A Participatory Process to Develop a Landslide Warning System: Paradoxes of Responsibility Sharing in a Case Study in Upper Austria," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Ashrika Sharma & Katherine Donovan & Sukanya Krishnamurthy & Maggie Creed, 2022. "Exploring the Scope of Public Participation for Risk Sensitive Land Use Planning in Nepal: A Policy Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:55:y:2016:i:p2:p:345-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-science-and-policy/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.