Author
Listed:
- de Paula, Douglas Augusto
- Flores, Eduardo
- Campbell, John L.
Abstract
This study examines the association between unrealized cash flow hedge (CFH) and future profitability and stock returns outside the United States. Using a panel of 2832 non-financial firms from 44 countries during 2005–2023, we examine whether unrealized CFH predict future profitability and stock returns. We find evidence broadly consistent with U.S. studies prior to IFRS 9 in 2018. Specifically, in this period, unrealized CFH balances are negatively associated with subsequent changes in profitability. However, investors in non-U.S. firms appear to price the implications of unrealized CFH for future profitability more slowly than investors in U.S. firms. After IFRS 9 in 2018, the results hinge critically on whether firms' hedge positions are in a net a distinction not previously documented in U.S. settings. Specifically, we find that firms with large unrealized CFH losses experience higher future profitability and positive future stock returns, whereas firms with large unrealized CFH gains show no association with future profitability. Furthermore, we continue to find delayed investor pricing. All results are stronger for firms from emerging markets. Overall, the evidence suggests that investors in non-U.S. markets face greater challenges in understanding the implications of unrealized CFH for future performance. This difficulty may reflect differences in disclosure regimes or a broader difficulty in processing the complex relationship between hedge accounting outcomes, future cash flows, and firm value. Collectively, our findings highlight that unrealized CFH contain economically meaningful, forward-looking information, but that their profitability and valuation effects depend critically on accounting regimes and institutional environments.
Suggested Citation
de Paula, Douglas Augusto & Flores, Eduardo & Campbell, John L., 2026.
"Impact of cash flow hedge accounting on future profitability and stock returns: A cross-country comparison,"
Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ememar:v:73:y:2026:i:c:s1566014126000622
DOI: 10.1016/j.ememar.2026.101498
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ememar:v:73:y:2026:i:c:s1566014126000622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620356 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.