IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ememar/v73y2026ics1566014126000385.html

Minority shareholders protection and the incremental textual information in analysts' reports: A quasi-natural experiment in China

Author

Listed:
  • Fan, Niuniu
  • Su, Jie
  • Chen, Yao

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of minority shareholder protection on the information production behavior of financial analysts, with a particular focus on the China Securities Investor Service Center (CSISC)—a unique institutional governance mechanism. While investor protection is widely recognized for corporate governance, its influence on financial intermediaries remains underexplored. Using a comprehensive dataset of 489,265 firm-analyst-quarter observations from China's A-share market, we employ text analysis techniques to measure the incremental textual information in analysts' research reports. Our findings reveal that CSISC's exercise of rights significantly enhances analysts' textual information primarily by inducing firms to substantially improve the quantity and quality of their information disclosures. The impact is particularly pronounced for firms with high earnings management or long disclosure lags, as well as for non-star, less experienced, or less industry-expert analysts. CSISC's exercise also improves the quality of analysts' earnings forecast, indicating that minority investor activism encourages analysts to provide more idiosyncratic insights and in-depth firm-specific analyses rather than obscure language or simply replicating the firm's disclosed information post-CSISC. We also verify the distinct supervision effect of CSISC. Overall, our study underscores CSISC's pivotal role in shaping analysts' information production and indicates a complementary relationship between minority shareholder protection and analysts.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan, Niuniu & Su, Jie & Chen, Yao, 2026. "Minority shareholders protection and the incremental textual information in analysts' reports: A quasi-natural experiment in China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ememar:v:73:y:2026:i:c:s1566014126000385
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ememar.2026.101474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566014126000385
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ememar.2026.101474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ememar:v:73:y:2026:i:c:s1566014126000385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620356 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.