IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ememar/v72y2026ics1566014126000154.html

Compromised employee attention: Overnight returns and labor productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Dongxu
  • Li, Xinqi
  • Zou, Ruiyang

Abstract

Employees dedicate attention to work productivity in anticipation of higher income, whereas their attention might be (un)consciously compromised by external distractions, resulting in the employer's sizable opportunity costs. Combining daily personnel records of a Chinese unlisted manufacturer with stock market data, we find that market overnight returns negatively predicts same-day worker output. The effect is greater on Mondays and extreme overnights. Analysis suggests that the stock market attracts (discourages) public attention when the overnight returns are extremely positive (negative), consistent with humans' natural tendency of incorporating good news while discounting bad news. Consequently, employees at work are disproportionally distracted by positive overnight returns, leading to reduced output. Additional evidence suggests that our results can hardly be explained with alternative distraction events or workers' stock wealth concerns. This study reveals a novel channel through which the financial market shapes labor supply.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Dongxu & Li, Xinqi & Zou, Ruiyang, 2026. "Compromised employee attention: Overnight returns and labor productivity," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ememar:v:72:y:2026:i:c:s1566014126000154
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ememar.2026.101451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566014126000154
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ememar.2026.101451?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ememar:v:72:y:2026:i:c:s1566014126000154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620356 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.