IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eecrev/v187y2026ics0014292126001078.html

Performance thresholds, effort and risk-taking

Author

Listed:
  • Campos-Mercade, Pol
  • Currarini, Sergio
  • Marchiori, Carmen
  • Mengel, Friederike

Abstract

We study, theoretically and experimentally, the impact of performance thresholds on effort and risk-taking. Our theory predicts that thresholds typically increase effort provision, but that the magnitude of this increase varies non-monotonically with the threshold level. For risk-taking, the effects are positive for high thresholds and negative for low thresholds. We characterize these patterns through the subtle interplay between effort and risk, which transition from complements to substitutes as thresholds become more demanding. Our experiment (N=1092) supports the theoretical predictions, showing that high thresholds raise both effort and risk-taking, whereas more moderate thresholds raise effort but lower risk-taking. Importantly, the experiment sheds light on the crucial role of individual heterogeneity: because individuals have different baseline performances, the same threshold can be perceived as high by some and low by others, producing opposite behavioral responses. The analysis highlights that effective threshold design must understand not only how thresholds shape effort and risk-taking, but also the characteristics of the targeted population.

Suggested Citation

  • Campos-Mercade, Pol & Currarini, Sergio & Marchiori, Carmen & Mengel, Friederike, 2026. "Performance thresholds, effort and risk-taking," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:187:y:2026:i:c:s0014292126001078
    DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292126001078
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:187:y:2026:i:c:s0014292126001078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eer .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.