IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eecrev/v180y2025ics0014292125002399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“I don’t believe that you believe what I believe”: an experiment on misperceptions of social norms and whistleblowing

Author

Listed:
  • Mir Djawadi, Behnud
  • Plaß, Sabrina
  • Loer, Sabrina

Abstract

Social norms shape economic decision-making, yet individuals often systematically misperceive what others think and do, potentially leading to suboptimal social outcomes. While existing research has demonstrated the prevalence and consequences of norm misperceptions across various domains, the literature has remained surprisingly silent on norm-enforcing behaviours. Despite their important role in providing collective benefits, these behaviours are regularly avoided because they may be viewed ambivalently by peers and create personal costs and interpersonal conflict for the actor. Using whistleblowing as an example of a broader category of regulatory behaviour, we examine whether i) norm misperceptions inhibit enforcement actions in the form of whistleblowing, and ii) norm-based interventions can effectively induce a behavioural change in this challenging domain. Through survey data and an incentivised laboratory experiment, we demonstrate that while a majority of individuals (77.55 %) privately support whistleblowing, almost half (45.92 %) misperceive the majority's view. This misperception has significant behavioural consequences: even when individuals personally support whistleblowing, their likelihood of reporting decreases by more than 30 % when normative expectations are perceived to favour silence rather than reporting. A social information intervention revealing the distribution of peer support shows only modest effectiveness. While it marginally increases whistleblowing among those already personally favouring reporting, it does not affect those who personally oppose whistleblowing. Our findings demonstrate the boundaries of norm interventions in enforcement contexts and suggest that, specifically for whistleblowing, corrections of norm misperceptions should not be viewed as substitutes for conventional approaches, such as financial incentives or whistleblower protection, in promoting whistleblowing.

Suggested Citation

  • Mir Djawadi, Behnud & Plaß, Sabrina & Loer, Sabrina, 2025. "“I don’t believe that you believe what I believe”: an experiment on misperceptions of social norms and whistleblowing," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:180:y:2025:i:c:s0014292125002399
    DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014292125002399
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.105189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C92 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Group Behavior
    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D9 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:180:y:2025:i:c:s0014292125002399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eer .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.