Author
Listed:
- Xu, Xibao
- Xiong, Ziyi
- Tan, Yan
- Qin, Xiaolin
- He, Baoshi
Abstract
Coastal areas provide critical Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES), but their multi-dimensional characteristics remain inadequately quantified, hindering integrated management. This study develops a novel CES assessment framework for China's Bohai Rim coastal zone, integrating social media data, automated text mining (ROST CM6), and Self-Organizing Map (SOM) clustering to analyze the spatial-temporal patterns and interrelationships of ten CES categories across 37 major tourist attractions. Results reveal pronounced heterogeneity in CES perceptions: nature appreciation (32.67%) and recreation value (19.35%) were dominant, whereas cultural heritage and educational value were minimal (2–4%). Temporally (2010−2023), recreation value increased modestly (1.2% annually), while cultural heritage perceptions declined. The functional roles of attractions were predominantly natural and recreational; other categories, such as cultural diversity and spiritual value, were less common, mirroring the observed perceptual patterns. Correlation analysis identified strong synergies – e.g., between spiritual and aesthetic values and between cultural heritage and inspiration – though cultural heritage showed weak associations with other CES. The integrated CES indicator framework developed here provides a methodological advance for ecosystem services research and supports evidence-based conservation of regional cultural ecosystems and socio-economic coordinated development and socio-economically coordinated development of regional cultural ecosystems.
Suggested Citation
Xu, Xibao & Xiong, Ziyi & Tan, Yan & Qin, Xiaolin & He, Baoshi, 2026.
"Quantifying and classifying cultural ecosystem Services in Coastal China: An integrated text mining approach,"
Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:80:y:2026:i:c:s2212041626000677
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101879
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:80:y:2026:i:c:s2212041626000677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.