Author
Listed:
- Xu, Zichang
- Hu, Hongwei
- Tan, Rong
Abstract
The marketization of ecosystem services (MES) refers to institutional arrangements that assign economic value to ecosystem services (ES) and enable their exchange through market mechanisms. Its core aim is to incentivize the protection and sustainable provision of ES. A distinctive form of MES, which can be termed government-led ES market development, exists in China: the government plays a constitutive role in building markets—defining property rights, establishing trading rules, and enrolling diverse actors into market-like transactions—while also participating directly as a market actor through state-owned enterprises. Consequently, the behaviour of subnational governments plays a decisive role in determining the success or failure of such markets, yet why some proactively support and engage in MES while others remain passive is poorly understood. To address this gap, we developed a “capacity–pressure–incentive” framework and applied fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to 31 Chinese provinces. Three findings emerge. First, no single condition independently explains subnational support; capacity, pressure, and incentive operate configurally. Second, configurations with all three dimensions form the most robust pathway to high support; when two dimensions are present, only “capacity–pressure” and “pressure–incentive” yield high support, while “capacity–incentive” does not; configurations with only one dimension consistently result in non-high support. Third, pressure plays a core yet conditional role—its effectiveness depends on combination with either capacity or incentive. Building on these findings, this study offers a novel perspective on the feasibility of government-led MES by centering on subnational government behaviour, while providing an analytical framework applicable to diverse stakeholders in ES governance.
Suggested Citation
Xu, Zichang & Hu, Hongwei & Tan, Rong, 2026.
"Reconsidering ecosystem services marketization: subnational government behaviour and motivation in China,"
Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:80:y:2026:i:c:s2212041626000586
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101870
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:80:y:2026:i:c:s2212041626000586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.