IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v79y2026ics2212041626000562.html

Exploring the economic trade-offs of carbon farming practices: A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Maggio, Vincenzo
  • Tulone, Antonio
  • Ludicina, Vito Armando
  • Paliaga, Sara
  • Biondo, Adriano
  • Galati, Antonino

Abstract

The paper provides a systematic literature review in order to investigate the economic dimensions related to the adoption of carbon farming practices, with the aim of assessing their economic sustainability in the medium to long term and thus identifying the main barriers and economic-political levers that influence their diffusion. The analysis, based on the PRISMA protocol, includes 46 studies selected from international scientific databases and reveals substantial heterogeneity in the economic performance of adopted practices, influenced by structural, agronomic and institutional factors. The main areas analysed include: implementation and management costs, cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis, profitability and impact of policy measures. Evidence shows that low-input practices generally have a favourable cost-effectiveness ratio. In contrast, structural or capital-intensive practices are only economically viable in the presence of appropriate incentives or well structured carbon markets. Furthermore, the paper emphasises the importance of public policies in bridging the gap between environmental benefits and economic returns, highlighting the effectiveness of performance-based schemes over those based on lump-sum payments per activity. The results contribute to the scientific debate on the agro-ecological transition, offering theoretical, managerial and policy implications for the definition of effective economic instruments for the transition towards climate-smart and low emission agricultural systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Maggio, Vincenzo & Tulone, Antonio & Ludicina, Vito Armando & Paliaga, Sara & Biondo, Adriano & Galati, Antonino, 2026. "Exploring the economic trade-offs of carbon farming practices: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:79:y:2026:i:c:s2212041626000562
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041626000562
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:79:y:2026:i:c:s2212041626000562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.