IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v79y2026ics2212041626000367.html

What drives cultural ecosystem services in mountain protected areas? An AI-assisted answer using social media data

Author

Listed:
  • Pérez-Girón, José Carlos
  • Navarro, Carlos Javier
  • Elghouat, Akram
  • Khaldi, Rohaifa
  • López-Pacheco, Domingo
  • Arenas-Castro, Salvador
  • del Águila, Ana
  • Moreno-Llorca, Ricardo
  • Pistón, Nuria
  • Romero, Luis F.
  • Vaz, Ana Sofía
  • Tabik, Siham
  • Martínez-López, Javier
  • Alcaraz-Segura, Domingo

Abstract

Understanding how environmental and social factors shape the distribution of Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) is essential for balancing biodiversity conservation and human well-being in protected areas (PAs). In this study, we integrate crowdsourced social media data, complementary AI-based image classification approaches (deep learning and large language models), and ecological niche models (ENMs) to map and compare the supply and demand of CES in mountain PAs across southern Europe. Using geotagged photographs classified into eight CES types and retaining only consensus-based labels, we assessed model performance, compared generalized and park-specific ENM approaches, identified key environmental and social predictors, explored bundles, and evaluated the influence of protection categories on CES suitability. Our models performed well across most CES types, confirming that social media data, when combined with AI and ENMs, provide a reliable and scalable approach for mapping human-nature interactions. The analysis revealed that while no universal set of predictors explains CES supply, some variables consistently influenced multiple CES types. By contrasting generalized and localized models, we show that the transferability depends on the type of service considered, with some CES exhibiting stable drivers across regions and others being strongly context-dependent. CES clustered into two dominant bundles: one associated with cultural and heritage values and another linked to nature-based experiences. Across most CES types and protected areas, potential supply substantially exceeded observed demand, with usage ratios typically below 5%, revealing a large proportion of underutilized areas. PAs showed higher overall CES suitability than unprotected zones, with Biosphere Reserves exhibiting particularly balanced outcomes between conservation and human use. Overall, this study shows how integrative and comparative AI-assisted approaches can support context-sensitive management and the sustainable enjoyment of cultural benefits in mountain PAs.

Suggested Citation

  • Pérez-Girón, José Carlos & Navarro, Carlos Javier & Elghouat, Akram & Khaldi, Rohaifa & López-Pacheco, Domingo & Arenas-Castro, Salvador & del Águila, Ana & Moreno-Llorca, Ricardo & Pistón, Nuria & Ro, 2026. "What drives cultural ecosystem services in mountain protected areas? An AI-assisted answer using social media data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:79:y:2026:i:c:s2212041626000367
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041626000367
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:79:y:2026:i:c:s2212041626000367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.