IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v79y2026ics2212041626000343.html

A global analysis of key design factors for sustainable payment for ecosystem services schemes

Author

Listed:
  • Nazari, Mona
  • Grima, Nelson
  • Bottaro, Giorgia
  • Pecurul-Botines, Mireia
  • Pülzl, Helga
  • Vacik, Harald

Abstract

Payment for Ecosystem Service (PES) schemes are incentive-based mechanisms aimed at promoting sustainable land management and ecosystem conservation. While there is a wide diffusion of PES schemes, regional adaptation, governance, and long-term sustainability remain challenging. This study analyzes the key design factors influencing the effectiveness and adaptability of PES schemes in achieving environmental, social, and economic sustainability. We draw on 161 empirical PES cases and use a systematic framework based on: geographic location, ecosystem service type, spatial scale, temporal scale, type of compensation, presence of intermediaries, and business model. The sustainability outcome, assessed as a dependent variable, reflects the environmental, social, and economic performance of each PES case relative to its stated objectives and design attributes. Through frequency analysis, we identify common design factors in PES schemes. Water provisioning services are the most prevalent, and most PES schemes are implemented at a local scale with long-term agreements. Public-private and private-private business models are the most widely used, but their effectiveness depends on regional conditions. The role of intermediaries has fluctuated over time, experiencing a decline since 2010, yet they remain crucial in regions with complex governance structures, where they facilitate coordination and agreement management. Additionally, a Gephi network visualization is used as a co-occurrence mapping tool to explore how these factors interact to enhance sustainability in different dimensions, revealing three dominant PES design types that align with geographical location priorities and socioeconomic conditions. We also observe regional variations in PES design: High-income countries tend to prioritize long-term cultural services, while low- and middle-income countries focus on short-term provisioning needs. Our findings highlight the importance of context-specific PES models, long-term institutional and financial commitments, and well-structured compensation mechanisms to ensure sustainability. This review intends to assist PES designers and policy and decision-makers in developing PES schemes better tailored to contemporary challenges and opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Nazari, Mona & Grima, Nelson & Bottaro, Giorgia & Pecurul-Botines, Mireia & Pülzl, Helga & Vacik, Harald, 2026. "A global analysis of key design factors for sustainable payment for ecosystem services schemes," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:79:y:2026:i:c:s2212041626000343
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101846
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041626000343
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101846?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:79:y:2026:i:c:s2212041626000343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.