Author
Listed:
- Wu, Xiaoxia
- Wang, Yujun
- Liu, Qiong
- Ou, Minghao
Abstract
Inland wetlands are vital urban spaces that integrate ecological conservation with cultural experiences, offering diverse cultural ecosystem services (CES). However, existing CES assessment studies often fail to fully utilize social media text data, which may bias the identification of different service types and compromise the accuracy of spatial modeling. This study takes the Taihu Lake wetland as a case study, using user reviews from multiple social media platforms and applying in-depth semantic analysis to identify six types of CES: mental and psychological, cultural heritage, educational, inspiration, aesthetic, and recreational services. The MaxEnt model is used to map their spatial distribution and explore influencing factors. Results show that: (1) in-depth semantic analysis of multi-source social media texts enhances the accuracy of CES assessments, especially for subjective types like aesthetic and mental and psychological services; (2) CES in the Taihu Lake wetland show low values across the lake and a clear east–west decline on surrounding land. Mental and psychological services show the highest intensity, reflecting visitors’ reliance on urban ecological spaces for emotional well-being; and (3) the spatial distribution of CES is mainly shaped by socio-economic factors, with human–environment interactions as the foundation and transportation accessibility as a key catalyst. Natural factors provide ecological support but have limited explanatory power. This study advances the assessment of intangible CES, clarifies their spatial distribution, and provides theoretical and practical support for human–environment coordination and regional governance in inland wetlands.
Suggested Citation
Wu, Xiaoxia & Wang, Yujun & Liu, Qiong & Ou, Minghao, 2026.
"The power of social media text: Mapping the distribution and drivers of cultural ecosystem services in Taihu Lake wetland,"
Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:79:y:2026:i:c:s2212041626000318
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101843
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:79:y:2026:i:c:s2212041626000318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.