Author
Listed:
- Kok, Sien
- Hein, Lars
- le Clec’h, Solen
- Penning, W.Ellis
- Buijse, Anthonie D.
Abstract
Rivers across the globe are under increasing pressure from climatic and anthropogenic threats, which has led to a widespread recognition of the need for integrated, holistic river management and ecological restoration. Economic analyses such as cost-benefit analysis (CBA) often play an important role in the decision-making process. However, (peer-reviewed) information on costs of measures is scarce, existing studies are limited in scope and there is a lack of approaches that integrate biophysical – socioeconomic metrics to allow for spatially explicit scenario analysis. By quantifying and monetising the supply of ten ecosystem services under three integrated river- and floodplain management (RFM) strategies incorporating Nature-based Solutions for the river Rhine in the Netherlands, this study develops such approaches, demonstrates the impact of adopting of a wider scope in CBA and includes an in-depth analysis of investment costs. Of the ten monetized benefits, the amenity value of landscape quality (up to 730 MEUR) and bequest-existence value of wildlife habitats (up to 5030 MEUR) have the highest values. Our results illustrate that expanding the scope of benefits considered can lead to significant changes in the benefit-cost ratio and the ranking of preferred strategies, with potential implications for strategic choices. Overall, our study presents a practical approach for integrating biophysical-economic indicators to support broader valuation of integrated river-floodplain management (RFM) strategies, in line with EC recommendations for water policy and particularly relevant for upcoming Nature Restoration Plans which are being developed under the EU Nature Restoration Regulation.
Suggested Citation
Kok, Sien & Hein, Lars & le Clec’h, Solen & Penning, W.Ellis & Buijse, Anthonie D., 2026.
"Room for the River: An extended cost benefit analysis of integrated river-floodplain management for the Rhine in the Netherlands,"
Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:78:y:2026:i:c:s2212041626000185
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101830
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:78:y:2026:i:c:s2212041626000185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.