Author
Listed:
- Menconi, MariaElena
- Vizzari, Marco
- Grohmann, David
Abstract
Urban areas are facing increasing environmental pressures, particularly in densely built-up neighborhoods with limited opportunities for incorporating greenery. This study proposes a spatially explicit methodology to optimize Local Regulating Ecosystem Services (LRES), particularly air pollution removal, through nature-based retrofitting scenarios. First, we evaluate the baseline, integrating municipal tree inventory data with high-resolution LiDAR and orthophotography to estimate the complete urban forest, including trees on private lands, in a Mediterranean city context. Then, we develop a Simulated Optimal Tree (SOT) model from high-performing real trees. We use it to assess the potential of five scenarios: densification of trees in public parks (SC1) and private gardens (SC2), implementation of green roofs on flat-roofed buildings (SC3), conversion of marginal agricultural land into urban forests (SC4), and densification of tree-lined streets (SC5). Results show that reforesting agricultural land (SC4) delivers the highest ecosystem service gains, with a 237.4% rise in PM2.5 removal compared to the baseline. However, spatial constraints and closeness to pollution sources suggest that interventions like street trees (SC5), despite lower overall gains, remain essential to ensure alignment between demand and service delivery. The approach demonstrates how integrating field-based and remote-sensing data can guide urban greening investments and support decision-making for sustainable and resilient cities. The method is replicable, cost-effective, and adaptable for public administrations aiming to enhance LRES provision while considering spatial and structural constraints typical of high-density urban environments.
Suggested Citation
Menconi, MariaElena & Vizzari, Marco & Grohmann, David, 2026.
"Optimizing local regulating ecosystem services through nature-based urban retrofitting scenarios,"
Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:77:y:2026:i:c:s2212041625001093
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101805
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:77:y:2026:i:c:s2212041625001093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.