IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v77y2026ics2212041625001093.html

Optimizing local regulating ecosystem services through nature-based urban retrofitting scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Menconi, MariaElena
  • Vizzari, Marco
  • Grohmann, David

Abstract

Urban areas are facing increasing environmental pressures, particularly in densely built-up neighborhoods with limited opportunities for incorporating greenery. This study proposes a spatially explicit methodology to optimize Local Regulating Ecosystem Services (LRES), particularly air pollution removal, through nature-based retrofitting scenarios. First, we evaluate the baseline, integrating municipal tree inventory data with high-resolution LiDAR and orthophotography to estimate the complete urban forest, including trees on private lands, in a Mediterranean city context. Then, we develop a Simulated Optimal Tree (SOT) model from high-performing real trees. We use it to assess the potential of five scenarios: densification of trees in public parks (SC1) and private gardens (SC2), implementation of green roofs on flat-roofed buildings (SC3), conversion of marginal agricultural land into urban forests (SC4), and densification of tree-lined streets (SC5). Results show that reforesting agricultural land (SC4) delivers the highest ecosystem service gains, with a 237.4% rise in PM2.5 removal compared to the baseline. However, spatial constraints and closeness to pollution sources suggest that interventions like street trees (SC5), despite lower overall gains, remain essential to ensure alignment between demand and service delivery. The approach demonstrates how integrating field-based and remote-sensing data can guide urban greening investments and support decision-making for sustainable and resilient cities. The method is replicable, cost-effective, and adaptable for public administrations aiming to enhance LRES provision while considering spatial and structural constraints typical of high-density urban environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Menconi, MariaElena & Vizzari, Marco & Grohmann, David, 2026. "Optimizing local regulating ecosystem services through nature-based urban retrofitting scenarios," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:77:y:2026:i:c:s2212041625001093
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041625001093
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101805?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. MariaElena Menconi & Rosaria Abbate & Luca Simone & David Grohmann, 2023. "Urban Green System Planning Insights for a Spatialized Balance between PM 10 Dust Retention Capacity of Trees and Urban Vehicular PM 10 Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Langemeyer, Johannes & Benra, Felipe & Nahuelhual, Laura & Zoderer, Brenda Maria, 2024. "Ecosystem Services Justice: The Emergence of a Critical Research Field," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. Davies, Clive & Lafortezza, Raffaele, 2019. "Transitional path to the adoption of nature-based solutions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 406-409.
    4. Menconi, Maria Elena & Abbate, Rosaria & Stocchi, Stefano & Grohmann, David, 2025. "Nature-related education and serious gaming to improve young citizens’ awareness about ecosystem services provided by urban trees," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    5. Sorada Tapsuwan & Raymundo Marcos‐Martinez & Heinz Schandl & Zefan Yu, 2021. "Valuing ecosystem services of urban forests and open spaces: application of the SEEA framework in Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(1), pages 37-65, January.
    6. Irene Vigevani & Denise Corsini & Jacopo Mori & Alice Pasquinelli & Marco Gibin & Sebastien Comin & Przemysław Szwałko & Edoardo Cagnolati & Francesco Ferrini & Alessio Fini, 2022. "Particulate Pollution Capture by Seventeen Woody Species Growing in Parks or along Roads in Two European Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Luca Rossi & Maria Elena Menconi & David Grohmann & Antonio Brunori & David J. Nowak, 2022. "Urban Planning Insights from Tree Inventories and Their Regulating Ecosystem Services Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Besley, Timothy & Coate, Stephen, 2003. "Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public goods: a political economy approach," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(12), pages 2611-2637, December.
    9. Maria Elena Menconi & Ambra Sipone & David Grohmann, 2021. "Complex Systems Thinking Approach to Urban Greenery to Provide Community-Tailored Solutions and Enhance the Provision of Cultural Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Gabriela Maksymiuk & Joanna Adamczyk & Renata Giedych & Dorota Pusłowska-Tyszewska & Magdalena Kuchcik & Agata Cieszewska, 2025. "Harnessing Street Canyons for Comprehensive Nature-Based Solutions," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, March.
    11. Babí Almenar, Javier & Elliot, Thomas & Rugani, Benedetto & Philippe, Bodénan & Navarrete Gutierrez, Tomas & Sonnemann, Guido & Geneletti, Davide, 2021. "Nexus between nature-based solutions, ecosystem services and urban challenges," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. MariaElena Menconi & Rosaria Abbate & Luca Simone & David Grohmann, 2023. "Urban Green System Planning Insights for a Spatialized Balance between PM 10 Dust Retention Capacity of Trees and Urban Vehicular PM 10 Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Menconi, Maria Elena & Abbate, Rosaria & Stocchi, Stefano & Grohmann, David, 2025. "Nature-related education and serious gaming to improve young citizens’ awareness about ecosystem services provided by urban trees," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    3. Xiaoping Zhou & Duanshuai Shen & Xiaokun Gu, 2022. "Influences of Land Policy on Urban Ecological Corridors Governance: A Case Study from Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Daniel Diermeier & Hulya Eraslan & Antonio Merlo, 2003. "The Effects of Constitutions on Coalition Governments in Parliamentary Democracies," PIER Working Paper Archive 03-037, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    5. Chau, Nancy H. & Qin, Yu & Zhang, Weiwen, 2015. "Networked Leaders in the Shadow of the Market – A Chinese Experiment in Allocating Land Conversion Rights," Working Papers 250022, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    6. Remme, Roy P. & Meacham, Megan & Pellowe, Kara E. & Andersson, Erik & Guerry, Anne D. & Janke, Benjamin & Liu, Lingling & Lonsdorf, Eric & Li, Meng & Mao, Yuanyuan & Nootenboom, Christopher & Wu, Tong, 2024. "Aligning nature-based solutions with ecosystem services in the urban century," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Nicola Acocella & Giovanni Di Bartolomeo, 2013. "Population location, commuting and local public goods: A political economy approach," CIMEO Working Paper Series 105, Centre for Investigation and Modelling of Experimental Observations (CIMEO).
    8. Gijs Roelofs & Daniel Vuuren, 2017. "The Decentralization of Social Assistance and the Rise of Disability Insurance Enrolment," De Economist, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Jean-Marc Bourgeon & Marie-Laure Breuillé, 2023. "Citizen preferences and the architecture of government," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(3), pages 537-585, October.
    10. Francis Bloch & Unal Zenginobuz, 2012. "Oates' Decentralization Theorem with Household Mobility," Working Papers hal-00657823, HAL.
    11. Francisco Silva, 2016. "Should the Government Provide Public Goods if it Cannot Commit?," Documentos de Trabajo 477, Instituto de Economia. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile..
    12. Jan K. Brueckner & Steven G. Craig & Kangoh Lee, 2019. "Samuelson Meets Federalism: Local Production of a National Public Good," CESifo Working Paper Series 7709, CESifo.
    13. Gianmarco Daniele & Amedeo Piolatto & Willem Sas, 2018. "Who Sent You? Strategic Voting, Transfers and Bailouts in a Federation," Working Papers. Serie AD 2018-05, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    14. Désirée Teobaldelli, 2011. "Federalism and the shadow economy," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 146(3), pages 269-289, March.
    15. Robert P. Inman, 2008. "Federalism's Values and the Value of Federalism," NBER Working Papers 13735, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Bowen, T. Renee & Chen, Ying & Eraslan, Hülya & Zápal, Jan, 2017. "Efficiency of flexible budgetary institutions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 148-176.
    17. Abdul Jalil, Ahmad Zafarullah, 2009. "The political economics of the Malaysian subnational governments’ fiscal behavior," MPRA Paper 24988, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Lars P. Feld & Horst Zimmermann & Thomas Döring, 2003. "Föderalismus, Dezentralität und Wirtschaftswachstum," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 72(3), pages 361-377.
    19. Fabio Fiorillo & Agnese Sacchi, 2012. "The Political Economy of the Standard Level of Services: The Role of Income Distribution," CESifo Working Paper Series 3696, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:77:y:2026:i:c:s2212041625001093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.