IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v76y2025ics2212041625000853.html

Analysis of spatiotemporal changes in ecosystem services distribution in the southern part of the Atlantic Forest in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Meister, Luana
  • Marques, Marcia C.M.

Abstract

Understanding ecosystem services (ES) is crucial for policies aimed at ensuring biodiversity conservation, natural resources, and livelihoods for humanity. In the state of Paraná, southern Brazil, the overlap between the Atlantic Forest domain and extensive agricultural areas suggests possible trade-offs between natural ecosystems and commodity production. This study aimed to evaluate the spatial distribution, synergies, trade-offs, and the net change among multiple ES at the state level. We selected nine indicators of four categories of ES: regulating services (carbon storage, soil conservation, and water yield), supporting services (plant biodiversity), provisioning services (cassava, orange, and soybean production), and cultural services (aesthetics and archaeological patrimony). Results indicated contrasting dynamics over the past decades. While provisioning services, especially soybean production, increased substantially, regulating services declined, revealing clear trade-offs in land-use priorities. Synergies were observed among regulating, cultural, and supporting services, especially in areas with preserved vegetation. Conversely, trade-offs emerged between provisioning and regulating services, notably between the expansion of soybeans and carbon storage. Municipalities exhibited variations in ES production, and four distinct groups were identified based on the similarity of indicator values among municipalities. These regional disparities, influenced by land use and conservation practices, resulted in the formation of landscape clusters (bundles): Non-fragmented Forest Landscape, Fragmented Forest Landscape, Homogeneous Agricultural Landscape, and Mixed Agricultural Landscape. Different synergies and trade-offs among ES indicators highlighted the ecological and social dynamics over time and the land use strategies promoted, which reduced regulating services in favor of commodity production. These findings demonstrate the spatial variability of ES and highlight how land-use strategies can intensify trade-offs while weakening ecological multifunctionality. The study highlights the importance of integrated land management in balancing provisioning demands with the maintenance of ecological functions and promoting the diversification of ecosystem services provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Meister, Luana & Marques, Marcia C.M., 2025. "Analysis of spatiotemporal changes in ecosystem services distribution in the southern part of the Atlantic Forest in Brazil," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:76:y:2025:i:c:s2212041625000853
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041625000853
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101781?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Renato A. F. Lima & Alexandre A. Oliveira & Gregory R. Pitta & André L. Gasper & Alexander C. Vibrans & Jérôme Chave & Hans Steege & Paulo I. Prado, 2020. "The erosion of biodiversity and biomass in the Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspot," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Yevheniia Varyvoda & Douglas Taren, 2022. "Considering Ecosystem Services in Food System Resilience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Peter Weißhuhn & Moritz Reckling & Ulrich Stachow & Hubert Wiggering, 2017. "Supporting Agricultural Ecosystem Services through the Integration of Perennial Polycultures into Crop Rotations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Matthias C. Rillig & Marcel G. A. Heijden & Miguel Berdugo & Yu-Rong Liu & Judith Riedo & Carlos Sanz-Lazaro & Eduardo Moreno-Jiménez & Ferran Romero & Leho Tedersoo & Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo, 2023. "Increasing the number of stressors reduces soil ecosystem services worldwide," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(5), pages 478-483, May.
    5. Oliver Reader, M. & Eppinga, Maarten B. & de Boer, Hugo J. & Petchey, Owen L. & Santos, Maria J., 2024. "Consistent ecosystem service bundles emerge across global mountain, island and delta systems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    6. Gugulica, Madalina & Burghardt, Dirk, 2023. "Mapping indicators of cultural ecosystem services use in urban green spaces based on text classification of geosocial media data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    7. Costanza, Robert & d'Arge, Ralph & de Groot, Rudolf & Farber, Stephen & Grasso, Monica & Hannon, Bruce & Limburg, Karin & Naeem, Shahid & O'Neill, Robert V. & Paruelo, Jose, 1998. "The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 3-15, April.
    8. Veerkamp, Clara J. & Schipper, Aafke M. & Hedlund, Katarina & Lazarova, Tanya & Nordin, Amanda & Hanson, Helena I., 2021. "A review of studies assessing ecosystem services provided by urban green and blue infrastructure," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    9. Fisher, Janet A. & Patenaude, Genevieve & Giri, Kalpana & Lewis, Kristina & Meir, Patrick & Pinho, Patricia & Rounsevell, Mark D.A. & Williams, Mathew, 2014. "Understanding the relationships between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: A conceptual framework," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 34-45.
    10. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Spatial dynamics of biophysical trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in the Himalayas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    11. Tengberg, Anna & Fredholm, Susanne & Eliasson, Ingegard & Knez, Igor & Saltzman, Katarina & Wetterberg, Ola, 2012. "Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: Assessment of heritage values and identity," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 14-26.
    12. Klein, Herbert S. & Vidal Luna, Francisco, 2021. "The Growth Of The Soybean Frontier In South America: The Case Of Brazil And Argentina," Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(3), pages 427-468, December.
    13. Xiao-Peng Song & Matthew C. Hansen & Peter Potapov & Bernard Adusei & Jeffrey Pickering & Marcos Adami & Andre Lima & Viviana Zalles & Stephen V. Stehman & Carlos M. Bella & Maria C. Conde & Esteban J, 2021. "Massive soybean expansion in South America since 2000 and implications for conservation," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(9), pages 784-792, September.
    14. Kirby, Matthew G. & Zawadzka, Joanna & Scott, Alister J., 2024. "Ecosystem service multifunctionality and trade-offs in English Green Belt peri-urban planning," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    15. Dietrich, Anne Sophie & Carini, Valeria & Vico, Giulia & Bommarco, Riccardo & Hansson, Helena, 2025. "Changing the understanding of crop production: Integrating ecosystem services into the production function," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    16. Havinga, Ilan & Marcos, Diego & Bogaart, Patrick & Tuia, Devis & Hein, Lars, 2024. "Understanding the sentiment associated with cultural ecosystem services using images and text from social media," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Claudia Bieling & Tobias Plieninger, 2013. "Recording Manifestations of Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Landscape," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 649-667, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ungaro, F. & Häfner, K. & Zasada, I. & Piorr, A., 2016. "Mapping cultural ecosystem services: Connecting visual landscape quality to cost estimations for enhanced services provision," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 399-412.
    2. van den Belt, Marjan & Stevens, Sharon M., 2016. "Transformative agenda, or lost in the translation? A review of top-cited articles in the first four years of Ecosystem Services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PA), pages 60-72.
    3. Vassiliki Vlami & Ioannis P. Kokkoris & Stamatis Zogaris & George Kehayias & Panayotis Dimopoulos, 2020. "Cultural Ecosystem Services in the Natura 2000 Network: Introducing Proxy Indicators and Conflict Risk in Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Márquez, Laura Andreina Matos & Rezende, Eva Caroline Nunes & Machado, Karine Borges & Nascimento, Emilly Layne Martins do & Castro, Joana D'arc Bardella & Nabout, João Carlos, 2023. "Trends in valuation approaches for cultural ecosystem services: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Bieling, Claudia, 2014. "Cultural ecosystem services as revealed through short stories from residents of the Swabian Alb (Germany)," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 8(C), pages 207-215.
    6. Margaret V. du Bray & Rhian Stotts & Melissa Beresford & Amber Wutich & Alexandra Brewis, 2019. "Does ecosystem services valuation reflect local cultural valuations? Comparative analysis of resident perspectives in four major urban river ecosystems," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(1), pages 21-33, January.
    7. Kubiszewski, Ida & Concollato, Luke & Costanza, Robert & Stern, David I., 2023. "Changes in authorship, networks, and research topics in ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Shuyao Wu & Delong Li & Ximan Sun & Kai-di Liu & Wentao Zhang & Binbin V. Li & Shuangcheng Li & Lumeng Liu & Fangjin Xu & Jinwei Dong & Laibao Liu & Weili Duan & Zhonghao Zhang, 2026. "Ecosystem service demand relationship and trade-off patterns in urban parks across China," Papers 2602.11442, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    9. Xiao, Lan & Haiping, Tang & Haoguang, Liang, 2017. "A theoretical framework for researching cultural ecosystem service flows in urban agglomerations," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 95-104.
    10. Marchioni, Mariana & Raimondi, Franco & Becciu, Gianfranco & Dresti, Claudia, 2025. "Nature-based solutions for watershed management: An investigation on water-related ecosystem services delivery at multiple spatial scales," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    11. Comalada, F. & Llorente, O. & Acuña, V. & Saló, J. & Garcia, X., 2025. "Using georeferenced text from social media to map the cultural ecosystem services of freshwater ecosystems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    12. Borrello, M. & Cecchini, L. & Vecchio, R. & Caracciolo, F. & Cembalo, L. & Torquati, B., 2022. "Agricultural landscape certification as a market-driven tool to reward the provisioning of cultural ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    13. Lingbo Fu & Hongpeng Fu & Chengyu Xiong, 2025. "Evaluating Perceived Cultural Ecosystem Services in Urban Green Spaces Using Big Data and Machine Learning: Insights from Fragrance Hill Park in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Wei Jiang & Rainer Marggraf, 2021. "Ecosystems in Books: Evaluating the Inspirational Service of the Weser River in Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Helen Kopnina, 2013. "Forsaking Nature? Contesting ‘Biodiversity’ Through Competing Discourses of Sustainability," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 7(1), pages 51-63, March.
    16. Santos-Martín, F. & Zorrilla-Miras, P. & Palomo, I. & Montes, C. & Benayas, J. & Maes, J., 2019. "Protecting nature is necessary but not sufficient for conserving ecosystem services: A comprehensive assessment along a gradient of land-use intensity in Spain," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 43-51.
    17. Zhang, Yuxin & Fu, Bin & Sun, Juying & da Silva, Ramon Felipe Bicudo, 2025. "Quantifying supply and demand of cultural ecosystem services from a dynamic perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    18. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Examining policy−institution−program (PIP) responses against the drivers of ecosystem dynamics. A chronological review (1960–2020) from Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    19. Remme, Roy P. & Meacham, Megan & Pellowe, Kara E. & Andersson, Erik & Guerry, Anne D. & Janke, Benjamin & Liu, Lingling & Lonsdorf, Eric & Li, Meng & Mao, Yuanyuan & Nootenboom, Christopher & Wu, Tong, 2024. "Aligning nature-based solutions with ecosystem services in the urban century," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Busch, Christin & Specht, Kathrin & Inostroza, Luis & Falke, Matthias & Zepp, Harald, 2024. "Disentangling cultural ecosystem services co-production in urban green spaces through social media reviews," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:76:y:2025:i:c:s2212041625000853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.