IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v73y2025ics2212041625000440.html

Spatial patterns and interactions among multiple cultural ecosystem services across urban greenspaces

Author

Listed:
  • Cao, Haojie
  • Miguez, Nataly G.
  • Mason, Brittany M.
  • Callaghan, Corey T.
  • Qiu, Jiangxiao

Abstract

Urban greenspaces (UGS) deliver substantial benefits to human wellbeing by providing valuable ecosystem services. Prior research on UGS has been primarily focused on provisioning and regulating services, with comparatively fewer studies explicitly addressing cultural ecosystem services (CES), presumably due to conceptual and methodological challenges in their characterization and quantification. Social media data have emerged as novel datasets that could provide new insights into the quantification of these intangible, highly context-specific, but critically important CES. In this study, we merged multiple platforms, including TripAdvisor and Google Maps that are among the most comprehensive user-generated datasets, to map and quantify the spatial distribution of 11 CES. Employing named-entity recognition models, this study extracted 60,156 textual entities related to CES from scraped reviews, allowing us to categorize 30,599 reviews into different CES types across 426 urban greenspaces. Our research demonstrated substantial spatial heterogeneity in the presence and diversity of CES and identified six key CES bundles, revealing more occurrences of CES synergies than tradeoffs across UGS. Geographical random forest models were applied to determine the relative importance of natural landscape elements, biodiversity proxies, and human utility metrics in explaining the spatial heterogeneity of CES. We found that factors such as greenspace size, tree cover percentage, biodiversity, and water features emerged as strong predictors of CES provision. Our study provides a roadmap and research framework for understanding and quantifying CES in urban settings and has implications for the sustainable planning and management of UGS to improve social wellbeing through the contribution of diverse CES.

Suggested Citation

  • Cao, Haojie & Miguez, Nataly G. & Mason, Brittany M. & Callaghan, Corey T. & Qiu, Jiangxiao, 2025. "Spatial patterns and interactions among multiple cultural ecosystem services across urban greenspaces," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:73:y:2025:i:c:s2212041625000440
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041625000440
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fox, Nathan & Graham, Laura J. & Eigenbrod, Felix & Bullock, James M. & Parks, Katherine E., 2021. "Enriching social media data allows a more robust representation of cultural ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    2. Pulighe, Giuseppe & Fava, Francesco & Lupia, Flavio, 2016. "Insights and opportunities from mapping ecosystem services of urban green spaces and potentials in planning," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PA), pages 1-10.
    3. Dickinson, Dawn C. & Hobbs, Richard J., 2017. "Cultural ecosystem services: Characteristics, challenges and lessons for urban green space research," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 179-194.
    4. Kong, Inhye & Sarmiento, Fausto O., 2022. "Utilizing a crowdsourced phrasal lexicon to identify cultural ecosystem services in El Cajas National Park, Ecuador," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    5. Marini Govigli, V. & Bruzzese, S., 2023. "Assessing the emotional and spiritual dimension of forests: A review of existing participatory methods," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    6. Benati, Giulia & Calcagni, Fulvia & Matellozzo, Federico & Ghermandi, Andrea & Langemeyer, Johannes, 2024. "Unequal access to cultural ecosystem services of green spaces within the city of Rome – A spatial social media-based analysis," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Richard T. T. Forman & Jianguo Wu, 2016. "Where to put the next billion people," Nature, Nature, vol. 537(7622), pages 608-611, September.
    8. Cooper, Nigel & Brady, Emily & Steen, Helen & Bryce, Rosalind, 2016. "Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems: Recognising the ontological and axiological plurality of cultural ecosystem ‘services’," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 218-229.
    9. Winthrop, Robert H., 2014. "The strange case of cultural services: Limits of the ecosystem services paradigm," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 208-214.
    10. Grzyb, Tomasz & Kulczyk, Sylwia & Derek, Marta & Woźniak, Edyta, 2021. "Using social media to assess recreation across urban green spaces in times of abrupt change," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    11. Mireia Gascon & Margarita Triguero-Mas & David Martínez & Payam Dadvand & Joan Forns & Antoni Plasència & Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen, 2015. "Mental Health Benefits of Long-Term Exposure to Residential Green and Blue Spaces: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-26, April.
    12. Havinga, Ilan & Marcos, Diego & Bogaart, Patrick & Tuia, Devis & Hein, Lars, 2024. "Understanding the sentiment associated with cultural ecosystem services using images and text from social media," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kovárník, Richard & Janová, Jitka & Hampel, David, 2025. "A comprehensive framework for automated identification of cultural ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Gladkikh, Tatiana M. & Gould, Rachelle K. & Coleman, Kimberly J., 2019. "Cultural ecosystem services and the well-being of refugee communities," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    3. Busch, Christin & Specht, Kathrin & Inostroza, Luis & Falke, Matthias & Zepp, Harald, 2024. "Disentangling cultural ecosystem services co-production in urban green spaces through social media reviews," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Bolaños-Valencia, Ingrid & Villegas-Palacio, Clara & López-Gómez, Connie Paola & Berrouet, Lina & Ruiz, Aura, 2019. "Social perception of risk in socio-ecological systems. A qualitative and quantitative analysis," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Tandarić, Neven & Ives, Christopher D. & Watkins, Charles, 2022. "From city in the park to “greenery in plant pots”: The influence of socialist and post-socialist planning on opportunities for cultural ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Yumeng Meng & Jiaxuan Shi & Mei Lyu & Dong Sun & Hiroatsu Fukuda, 2024. "Research into the Influence Mechanisms of Visual-Comfort and Landscape Indicators of Urban Green Spaces," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Adam P. Hejnowicz & Murray A. Rudd, 2017. "The Value Landscape in Ecosystem Services: Value, Value Wherefore Art Thou Value?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-34, May.
    8. Weixuan Wei & Yiqi Wang & Qi Yan & Guanpeng Liu & Nannan Dong, 2024. "Assessing Buffer Gradient Synergies: Comparing Objective and Subjective Evaluations of Urban Park Ecosystem Services in Century Park, Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-33, November.
    9. Seymour, Valentine & Willls, Betheney & Wilkin, Paul & Burt, Peter & Ikin, Ed & Stevenson, Philip C., 2022. "Incorporating citizen science to advance the Natural Capital approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    10. Grzyb, Tomasz, 2024. "Mapping cultural ecosystem services of the urban riverscapes: the case of the Vistula River in Warsaw, Poland," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Flood, Kate & Mahon, Marie & McDonagh, John, 2021. "Assigning value to cultural ecosystem services: The significance of memory and imagination in the conservation of Irish peatlands," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    12. Huai, Songyao & Chen, Fen & Liu, Song & Canters, Frank & Van de Voorde, Tim, 2022. "Using social media photos and computer vision to assess cultural ecosystem services and landscape features in urban parks," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    13. Richard T. Carson & W. Michael Hanemann & Dale Whittington, 2020. "The Existence Value of a Distinctive Native American Culture: Survival of the Hopi Reservation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 75(4), pages 931-951, April.
    14. Derek, Marta & Kulczyk, Sylwia & Grzyb, Tomasz & Woźniak, Edyta, 2025. "‘This is my magical place here’. Linking cultural ecosystem services and landscape elements in urban green spaces," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. Zhang, Yuxin & Fu, Bin & Sun, Juying & da Silva, Ramon Felipe Bicudo, 2025. "Quantifying supply and demand of cultural ecosystem services from a dynamic perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    16. Havinga, Ilan & Marcos, Diego & Bogaart, Patrick & Tuia, Devis & Hein, Lars, 2024. "Understanding the sentiment associated with cultural ecosystem services using images and text from social media," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Qiang Wen & Haiqiang Liu & Jinyuan Chen & Huiyao Ye & Zeyu Pan, 2023. "Evaluation of Satisfaction with the Built Environment of University Buildings under the Epidemic and Its Impact on Student Anxiety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-23, February.
    18. Hyun Jin Lee & Dong Kun Lee, 2019. "Do Sociodemographic Factors and Urban Green Space Affect Mental Health Outcomes Among the Urban Elderly Population?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-13, March.
    19. Hao-Ting Chang & Chih-Da Wu & Wen-Chi Pan & Shih-Chun Candice Lung & Huey-Jen Su, 2019. "Association Between Surrounding Greenness and Schizophrenia: A Taiwanese Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    20. Kenter, Jasper O. & Bryce, Rosalind & Christie, Michael & Cooper, Nigel & Hockley, Neal & Irvine, Katherine N. & Fazey, Ioan & O’Brien, Liz & Orchard-Webb, Johanne & Ravenscroft, Neil & Raymond, Chris, 2016. "Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 358-371.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:73:y:2025:i:c:s2212041625000440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.