IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecoser/v73y2025ics221204162500021x.html

Revealing driver-mediated indirect interactions between ecosystem services using Bayesian Belief Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Schwantes, Amanda M.
  • Firkowski, Carina Rauen
  • Gonzalez, Andrew
  • Fortin, Marie-Josée

Abstract

Understanding the drivers mediating ecosystem service interactions is essential for supporting policy decisions aimed at sustaining synergies and mitigating trade-offs. Currently, most studies assessing ecosystem service interactions do not model them as a causal network. Here, we use Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) to assess how human activity intensity influences ecosystem service interactions (e.g., trade-off, synergy, no effect). We quantify changes in interactions for two snapshots in time in Southern Quebec (Canada) among aboveground forest carbon regulation, maple syrup provisioning, livestock provisioning, landscape recreation, bird-watching recreation, and number of bird species per route (an Essential Biodiversity Variable). By comparing correlation analyses to BBNs with or without the driver of human activity intensity, we show that not accounting for human activity intensity results in incorrectly attributing a driver-mediated trade-off as a direct trade-off (e.g., between bird-watching recreation and aboveground forest carbon regulation) and failure to detect direct interactions (e.g., between bird-watching recreation and livestock provisioning). BBNs provide a more complete understanding of interactions. In contrast to correlation analysis, which can only assess a relationship between two variables, BBNs can assess relationships among multiple variables and as such determine whether a relationship is due to a shared driver or whether the relationship is due to a direct synergy or trade-off among services. However, if relevant drivers are excluded, then direct interactions may be missed, and driver-mediated relationships may be incorrectly attributed as direct interactions. A better understanding of drivers that shape ecosystem service interactions could guide their management and provide targeted policy interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Schwantes, Amanda M. & Firkowski, Carina Rauen & Gonzalez, Andrew & Fortin, Marie-Josée, 2025. "Revealing driver-mediated indirect interactions between ecosystem services using Bayesian Belief Networks," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:73:y:2025:i:c:s221204162500021x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221204162500021X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101717?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Forio, Marie Anne Eurie & Villa-Cox, Gonzalo & Van Echelpoel, Wout & Ryckebusch, Helena & Lock, Koen & Spanoghe, Pieter & Deknock, Arne & De Troyer, Niels & Nolivos-Alvarez, Indira & Dominguez-Granda,, 2020. "Bayesian Belief Network models as trade-off tools of ecosystem services in the Guayas River Basin in Ecuador," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    2. Laura E. Dee & Paul J. Ferraro & Christopher N. Severen & Kaitlin A. Kimmel & Elizabeth T. Borer & Jarrett E. K. Byrnes & Adam Thomas Clark & Yann Hautier & Andrew Hector & Xavier Raynaud & Peter B. R, 2023. "Publisher Correction: Clarifying the effect of biodiversity on productivity in natural ecosystems with longitudinal data and methods for causal inference," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-1, December.
    3. Scutari, Marco, 2010. "Learning Bayesian Networks with the bnlearn R Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 35(i03).
    4. Marcot, Bruce G., 2017. "Common quandaries and their practical solutions in Bayesian network modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 358(C), pages 1-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lyu, Rongfang & Zhao, Wenpeng & Pang, Jili & Tian, Xiaolei & Zhang, Jianming & Wang, Naiang, 2022. "Towards a sustainable nature reserve management: Using Bayesian network to quantify the threat of disturbance to ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    2. Prabal Das & D. A. Sachindra & Kironmala Chanda, 2022. "Machine Learning-Based Rainfall Forecasting with Multiple Non-Linear Feature Selection Algorithms," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(15), pages 6043-6071, December.
    3. Vuong, Quan-Hoang & La, Viet-Phuong, 2019. "The bayesvl R package. User guide v0.8.1," OSF Preprints w5dx6, Center for Open Science.
    4. F. Cugnata & G. Perucca & S. Salini, 2017. "Bayesian networks and the assessment of universities' value added," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(10), pages 1785-1806, July.
    5. Roland R. Ramsahai, 2020. "Connecting actuarial judgment to probabilistic learning techniques with graph theory," Papers 2007.15475, arXiv.org.
    6. Tang, Kayu & Parsons, David J. & Jude, Simon, 2019. "Comparison of automatic and guided learning for Bayesian networks to analyse pipe failures in the water distribution system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 24-36.
    7. Myriam Patricia Cifuentes & Clara Mercedes Suarez & Ricardo Cifuentes & Noel Malod-Dognin & Sam Windels & Jose Fernando Valderrama & Paul D. Juarez & R. Burciaga Valdez & Cynthia Colen & Charles Phill, 2022. "Big Data to Knowledge Analytics Reveals the Zika Virus Epidemic as Only One of Multiple Factors Contributing to a Year-Over-Year 28-Fold Increase in Microcephaly Incidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, July.
    8. repec:osf:osfxxx:yacs5_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Silvia de Juan & Maria Dulce Subida & Andres Ospina-Alvarez & Ainara Aguilar & Miriam Fernandez, 2020. "Disentangling the socio-ecological drivers behind illegal fishing in a small-scale fishery managed by a TURF system," Papers 2012.08970, arXiv.org.
    10. Meineri, Eric & Dahlberg, C. Johan & Hylander, Kristoffer, 2015. "Using Gaussian Bayesian Networks to disentangle direct and indirect associations between landscape physiography, environmental variables and species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 127-136.
    11. repec:osf:osfxxx:dm467_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Michail Tsagris, 2021. "A New Scalable Bayesian Network Learning Algorithm with Applications to Economics," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 57(1), pages 341-367, January.
    13. Michael J. Brusco & Douglas Steinley & Ashley L. Watts, 2022. "Disentangling relationships in symptom networks using matrix permutation methods," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 133-155, March.
    14. Sarah R. Weiskopf & Forest Isbell & Maria Isabel Arce-Plata & Moreno Di Marco & Mike Harfoot & Justin Johnson & Susannah B. Lerman & Brian W. Miller & Toni Lyn Morelli & Akira S. Mori & Ensheng Weng &, 2024. "Biodiversity loss reduces global terrestrial carbon storage," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Sangsung Park & Sunghae Jun, 2020. "Patent Keyword Analysis of Disaster Artificial Intelligence Using Bayesian Network Modeling and Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-11, January.
    16. Ling Ling Wang & Tao Xin & Xiao Jian Sun, 2026. "Using the Bayesian Network’s Structural Learning Algorithm to Estimate the Q-Matrix in Cognitive Diagnosis Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 51(2), pages 419-450, April.
    17. Ceriani, Lidia & Gigliarano, Chiara & Verme, Paolo, 2025. "Optimizing data-driven weights in multidimensional indexes," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    18. Federica Cugnata & Silvia Salini & Elena Siletti, 2021. "Deepening Well-Being Evaluation with Different Data Sources: A Bayesian Networks Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-10, July.
    19. Bibartiu, Otto & Dürr, Frank & Rothermel, Kurt & Ottenwälder, Beate & Grau, Andreas, 2021. "Scalable k-out-of-n models for dependability analysis with Bayesian networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    20. Lingfei Wang, 2021. "Single-cell normalization and association testing unifying CRISPR screen and gene co-expression analyses with Normalisr," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    21. Wesley L Crouse & Gregory R Keele & Madeleine S Gastonguay & Gary A Churchill & William Valdar, 2022. "A Bayesian model selection approach to mediation analysis," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-33, May.
    22. Bruce G. Marcot & Anca M. Hanea, 2021. "What is an optimal value of k in k-fold cross-validation in discrete Bayesian network analysis?," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 2009-2031, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:73:y:2025:i:c:s221204162500021x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.