Author
Listed:
- Walther, Franziska
- Barton, David N.
- Schwaab, Jonas
- Kato-Huerta, Jarumi
- Immerzeel, Bart
- Adamescu, Mihai
- Andersen, Erling
- Arámbula Coyote, Martha Verónica
- Arany, Ildikó
- Balzan, Mario
- Bruggeman, Adriana
- Carvalho-Santos, Claudia
- Cazacu, Constantin
- Geneletti, Davide
- Giuca, Relu
- Inácio, Miguel
- Lagabrielle, Erwann
- Lange, Sabine
- Clec’h, Solen Le
- Vanessa Lim, Zhi Yi
- Mörtberg, Ulla
- Nedkov, Stoyan
- Portela, Ana Paula
- Porucznik, Anna
- Racoviceanu, Tudor
- Rendón, Paula
- Ribeiro, Daniela
- Seguin, Joana
- Hribar, Mateja Šmid
- Stoycheva, Vanya
- Vejre, Henrik
- Zoumides, Christos
- Grêt-Regamey, Adrienne
Abstract
Ecosystem services (ES) assessments are rarely integrated into decision-making processes, with uncertainties often cited as a major barrier. While various uncertainties, such as modelling and data uncertainties, are inherent in ES assessments, their role in uptake of ES assessment results in decision-making remains unclear. We conducted a semi-systematic literature review of scientific papers assessing ES to reveal how uncertainties in ES assessments relate to ES uptake, i.e., the potential use of ES assessment results by decision makers. We performed logistic regressions to analyse the influence of three main sources of uncertainty on ES uptake, i.e., (i) modelling uncertainties, (ii) uncertainties related to qualitative and quantitative descriptions of scenarios, and (iii) uncertainties related to the transfer of ES assessment results into decision-making. Furthermore, we investigated if stakeholder involvement plays a role in ES uptake. First, and most importantly, the results indicate that clarifying the policy context can decrease decision uncertainty and thus improve ES uptake. Referring to a specific policy, following a decisive study purpose and documenting the intended policy entry point are factors that significantly enhance ES uptake. Second, the way how ES are modelled is related to ES uptake. Our results show that using multiple models to assess ES significantly promotes ES uptake. Third, involving stakeholders in ES assessments is significantly associated with increased documented uptake. We discuss that explicitly anchoring the assessment in a policy context increases the salience and timeliness of an ES study, assessing model uncertainties can lead to more credible results, and involving stakeholders can provide more legitimacy, which together increase the potential for ES assessments and their results to be used in decision-making. This study encourages future ES assessments to integrate uncertainties in order to support informed decision-making and promote the conservation and sustainable management of ecosystems and their services.
Suggested Citation
Walther, Franziska & Barton, David N. & Schwaab, Jonas & Kato-Huerta, Jarumi & Immerzeel, Bart & Adamescu, Mihai & Andersen, Erling & Arámbula Coyote, Martha Verónica & Arany, Ildikó & Balzan, Mario &, 2025.
"Uncertainties in ecosystem services assessments and their implications for decision support – A semi-systematic literature review,"
Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:73:y:2025:i:c:s221204162500018x
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101714
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:73:y:2025:i:c:s221204162500018x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecosystem-services .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.